Scaling Up a Community-Based Exercise Program for Women in Difficult Life Situations in Germany—The BIG Project as a Case-Study

Annika Herbert-Maul, Karim Abu-Omar, Anna Streber, Zsuzsanna Majzik, Jeanette Hefele, Stephanie Dobslaw, Hedi Werner, Alexandra Wolf and Anne K. Reimers
Additional contact information
Annika Herbert-Maul: Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-University, 91058 Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
Karim Abu-Omar: Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-University, 91058 Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
Anna Streber: Matrix GmbH & Co. KG, 91301 Forchheim, Germany
Zsuzsanna Majzik: Matrix GmbH & Co. KG, 91301 Forchheim, Germany
Jeanette Hefele: Office for Sport and Health Promotion, City of Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
Stephanie Dobslaw: Health Department, District Administration of Regensburg, 93059 Regensburg, Germany
Hedi Werner: Women’s Representative, Office for Social Services, City of Straubing, 94351 Straubing, Germany
Alexandra Wolf: Office for Children, Youth, Families and Integration, City of Bayreuth, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany
Anne K. Reimers: Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-University, 91058 Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 18, 1-16

Abstract: Scaling up community-based participatory research (CBPR) remains challenging. This case-study reports on how, and under which conditions, a CBPR project aiming at promoting exercise among socially disadvantaged women (BIG) scaled up at four project sites. As part of BIG, researchers support city administrations in implementing a participatory project to reach socially disadvantaged women for exercise. The case study was conducted in winter 2020 in southern Germany and is based on a co-creative process involving city administrators and researchers. Following Kohl and Cooley’s scaling up dimensions, scaling up BIG was investigated at the four sites using a mixed-method approach. Course registrations and offers were analysed, and qualitative interviews ( n = 4) with administrative staff members were conducted and analysed using content analysis. The geographical coverage of exercise classes, the addressed groups, and the utilisation of participatory methods by city administrations are described. All four sites managed to scale-up project activities. Three of the four sites reported that further growth of the project was no longer possible due to limited resources. All sites attempted to reach a larger number of, and more diverse, women. One site managed to scale-up the use of participatory methods within the city administration. The following important facilitators for scaling up CBPR projects were reported: advertisements tailored to the needs of the addressed women, utilising participatory approaches, and equipping project coordinators with sufficient resources.

Keywords: scaling up; health promotion; exercise; physical activity; socially disadvantaged groups; low socioeconomic status; ethnic minority; refugees (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9432/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9432/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9432-:d:630409

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().