Policy Inertia on Regulating Food Marketing to Children: A Case Study of Malaysia
SeeHoe Ng,
Bridget Kelly,
Heather Yeatman,
Boyd Swinburn and
Tilakavati Karupaiah
Additional contact information
SeeHoe Ng: Early Start, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Bridget Kelly: Early Start, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Heather Yeatman: Early Start, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Boyd Swinburn: School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1072, New Zealand
Tilakavati Karupaiah: School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya 47500, Malaysia
IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 18, 1-18
Abstract:
Unhealthy food marketing shapes children’s preference towards obesogenic foods. In Malaysia, policies regulating this food marketing were rated as poor compared to global standards, justifying the need to explore barriers and facilitators during policy development and implementation processes. The case study incorporated qualitative methods, including historical mapping, semi-structured interviews with key informants and a search of cited documents. Nine participants were interviewed, representing the Federal government ( n = 5), food industry ( n = 2) and civil society ( n = 2). Even though the mandatory approach to government-led regulation of food marketing to children was the benchmark, more barriers than facilitators in the policy process led to industry self-regulations in Malaysia. Cited barriers were the lack of political will, industry resistance, complexity of legislation, technical challenges, and lack of resources, particularly professional skills. The adoption of industry self-regulation created further barriers to subsequent policy advancement. These included implementer indifference (industry), lack of monitoring, poor stakeholder relations, and policy characteristics linked to weak criteria and voluntary uptake. These underlying barriers, together with a lack of sustained public health advocacy, exacerbated policy inertia. Key recommendations include strengthening pro-public health stakeholder partnerships, applying sustained efforts in policy advocacy to overcome policy inertia, and conducting monitoring for policy compliance and accountability. These form the key lessons for advocating policy reforms.
Keywords: food; marketing; advertising; barrier; facilitator; policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9607/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9607/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9607-:d:633936
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().