Effects of Six-Week Resistance Training with or without Vibration on Metabolic Markers of Bone Metabolism

Patrick Lau, Åsa Beijer, André Rosenberger, Eckhard Schoenau, Christoph Stephan Clemen, Jochen Zange and Jörn Rittweger
Additional contact information
Patrick Lau: German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, 51147 Cologne, Germany
Åsa Beijer: German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, 51147 Cologne, Germany
André Rosenberger: German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, 51147 Cologne, Germany
Eckhard Schoenau: Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
Christoph Stephan Clemen: German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, 51147 Cologne, Germany
Jochen Zange: German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, 51147 Cologne, Germany
Jörn Rittweger: German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, 51147 Cologne, Germany

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 18, 1-10

Abstract: Acute and protracted effects of resistive exercise (RE) and resistive exercise with whole-body vibration (RVE) on metabolic markers of bone metabolism were investigated. Twenty-six men participated in a randomized training program including RE ( n = 13; age = 23.4 ± 1.4 years) or RVE ( n = 13; age = 24.3 ± 3.3 years). During the first session, acute C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) responses decreased by 12.9% (standard deviation, SD 13.7%) after 2 min, followed by a 15.5% (SD 36.0%) increase at 75 min after exercise (both p < 0.001). Procollagen type I amino terminal propeptide (P1NP) increased by 12.9% (SD 9.1%) at 2 min ( p < 0.001) but no change occurred at 75 min. Sclerostin showed prolonged responses from 2 to 75 min post-exercise in the first session ( p < 0.001). Acute responses at the first session were comparable between groups for CTX and P1NP, acute sclerostin responses were substantially greater in RE than in RVE ( p = 0.003). No significant differences were noted in the resting baseline levels of CTX, P1NP, or sclerostin from the beginning to the end of the six-week progressive training. The present study therefore did not demonstrate any sizeable enhancement of bone turnover that could match the effects that have been repeatably made in response to countermeasure exercise during bed rest.

Keywords: strength training; bone markers; sclerostin; CTX; P1NP (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9860/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9860/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9860-:d:638721

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().