Rearward-Facing Infant Child Restraint Systems with Support Legs in Frontal and Frontal-Oblique Impacts

Declan A. Patton, Aditya N. Belwadi, Jalaj Maheshwari and Kristy B. Arbogast
Additional contact information
Declan A. Patton: Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19146, USA
Aditya N. Belwadi: Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19146, USA
Jalaj Maheshwari: Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19146, USA
Kristy B. Arbogast: Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19146, USA

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 20, 1-12

Abstract: Previous studies of support legs in rearward-facing infant CRS models have focused on frontal impacts and have found that the presence of a support leg is associated with a reduction in head injury metrics. However, real-world crashes often involve an oblique principal direction of force. The current study used sled tests to evaluate the effectiveness of support legs in rearward-facing infant CRS models for frontal and frontal-oblique impacts with and without a simulated front row seatback. Frontal and frontal-oblique impact sled tests were conducted using the simulated Consumer Reports test method with and without the blocker plate, which was developed to represent a front row seatback. The Q1.5 anthropomorphic test device (ATD) was seated in rearward-facing infant CRS models, which were tested with and without support legs. The presence of a support leg was associated with significant reductions of head injury metrics below injury tolerance limits for all tests, which supports the findings of previous studies. The presence of a support leg was also associated with significant reductions of peak neck tensile force. The presence of the blocker plate resulted in greater head injury metrics compared to tests without the blocker plate, but the result was non-significant. However, the fidelity of the interaction between the CRS and blocker plate as an adequate representation of the interaction that would occur in a real vehicle is not well understood. The findings from the current study continue to support the benefit of support legs in managing the energy of impact for a child in a rearward-facing CRS.

Keywords: anthropomorphic test device; child restraint; motor vehicle crash; sled testing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10799/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10799/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10799-:d:656415

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().