Trends in the Regulation of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): A Scoping Review

Nicole Marie Brennan, Abigail Teresa Evans, Meredith Kate Fritz, Stephanie Allison Peak and Haley Elizabeth von Holst
Additional contact information
Nicole Marie Brennan: Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
Abigail Teresa Evans: Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
Meredith Kate Fritz: Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
Stephanie Allison Peak: Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
Haley Elizabeth von Holst: Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 20, 1-28

Abstract: Products containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been used for decades in industrial and consumer products. These compounds are persistent in the environment, bioaccumulative, and some are toxic to humans and other animals. Since the early 2000s, laws, policies, and regulations have been implemented to reduce the prevalence of PFAS in the environment and exposures to PFAS. We conducted a scoping literature review to identify how PFAS are regulated internationally, at the U.S. national level, and at the U.S. state level, as well as drivers of and challenges to implementing PFAS regulations in the U.S. This review captured peer-reviewed scientific literature (e.g., PubMed), grey literature databases (e.g., SciTech Premium Collection), Google searches, and targeted websites (e.g., state health department websites). We identified 454 relevant documents, of which 61 discussed the non-U.S. PFAS policy, 214 discussed the U.S. national-level PFAS policy, and 181 discussed the U.S. state-level PFAS policy. The drivers of and challenges to PFAS regulation were identified through qualitative analysis. The drivers of PFAS policy identified were political support for regulation, social awareness of PFAS, economic resource availability, and compelling scientific evidence. The challenges to implementing PFAS regulations were political limitations, economic challenges, unclear scientific evidence, and practical challenges. The implications for PFAS policy makers and other stakeholders are discussed.

Keywords: PFAS; policy; environment; regulation; analysis; exposure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10900/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10900/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10900-:d:658445

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().