Regulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around “Black Market” Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review

Heather Wardle, Gerda Reith, Fiona Dobbie, Angela Rintoul and Jeremy Shiffman
Additional contact information
Heather Wardle: School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RT, UK
Gerda Reith: School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RT, UK
Fiona Dobbie: Usher Institute, Old Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
Angela Rintoul: Health Innovation and Transformation Centre, Federation University, Churchill, VIC 3842, Australia
Jeremy Shiffman: Bloomberg School of Public Health and School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 21, 1-20

Abstract: Commercial gambling is increasingly viewed as being part of the unhealthy commodities industries, in which products contribute to preventable ill-health globally. Britain has one of the world’s most liberal gambling markets, meaning that the regulatory changes there have implications for developments elsewhere. A review of the British Gambling Act 2005 is underway. This has generated a range of actions by the industry, including mobilising arguments around the threat of the “black market”. We critically explore industry’s framing of these issues as part of their strategy to resist regulatory change during the Gambling Act review. We used a predefined review protocol to explore industry narratives about the “black market” in media reports published between 8 December 2020 and 26 May 2021. Fifty-five articles were identified and reviewed, and themes were narratively synthesised to examine industry framing of the “black market”. The black market was framed in terms of economic threat and loss, and a direct connection was made between its growth and increased regulation. The articles mainly presented gambling industry perspectives uncritically, citing industry-generated evidence ( n = 40). Industry narratives around the “black market” speak to economically and emotionally salient concerns: fear, safety, consumer freedom and economic growth. This dominant framing in political, mainstream and industry media may influence political and public opinion to support the current status quo: “protecting” the existing regulated market rather than “protecting” people. Debates should be reframed to consider all policy options, especially those designed to protect public health.

Keywords: gambling; Great Britain; Gambling Act review; black market; unhealthy commodities; regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11566/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11566/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11566-:d:671607

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().