A Qualitative Study on Young Women’s Lives Prior to and Four Years after Youth Detention: Examining the Good Lives Model’s Aetiological Assumptions

Lore Van Damme, Clare-Ann Fortune, Stijn Vandevelde, Wouter Vanderplasschen and Olivier F. Colins
Additional contact information
Lore Van Damme: All-Male Youth Detention Center, De Zande, 8755 Ruiselede, Belgium
Clare-Ann Fortune: School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6012, New Zealand
Stijn Vandevelde: Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium
Wouter Vanderplasschen: Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium
Olivier F. Colins: Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 22, 1-32

Abstract: Detained female adolescents constitute a vulnerable, challenging, and understudied minority. Interventions for DFA are still dominated by risk management approaches with less focus on strength-based approaches such as the Good Lives Model (GLM). This study explored the functionality of DFA’s behaviour prior to and four years after release from detention, using the GLM as the guiding theoretical framework. A theory-driven thematic analysis was conducted of 30 in-depth interviews with former DFA ( M age = 20.80), exploring the fulfilment of their basic human needs (e.g., relatedness, independence) before and after detention. Before detention, the young women experienced multiple problems trying to fulfil multiple human needs, often contributing to poor balance in their lives and their antisocial behaviour. Although external and internal obstacles to fulfilling human needs were still present at follow-up, important improvements were noted, e.g., in the scope of their human needs and the resources available to fulfil their needs. The findings provide additional insights into the issues experienced by young women in detention and indicate there are opportunities to assist these young women, through the development of appropriate resources and capacities which provide them with appropriate means for fulfilling their needs and moving towards a personally meaningful and prosocial life.

Keywords: aetiology; desistance; follow-up studies; good lives model; women; youth detention (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11830/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11830/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:11830-:d:677087

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().