EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Disposal of Waste from Tattoo and Beauty Parlors in Poland: A Survey-Based Analysis on Epidemiological Safety

Anita Gębska-Kuczerowska, Izabela Kucharska, Agnieszka Segiet-Święcicka, Marcin Kuczerowski and Robert Gajda
Additional contact information
Anita Gębska-Kuczerowska: Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Kazimierza Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland
Izabela Kucharska: Chief Sanitary Inspectorate, Targowa 65, 03-729 Warsaw, Poland
Agnieszka Segiet-Święcicka: Faculty and Department of Experimental Physiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Żwirki i Wigury 61, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
Marcin Kuczerowski: Clinical Department of Oncological Gynecology and Obstetrics, Professor Witold Orlowski Independent Public Clinical Hospital, Czerniakowska 231, 00-416 Warsaw, Poland
Robert Gajda: Gajda-Med Medical Center, ul. Piotra Skargi 23/29, 06-100 Pułtusk, Poland

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 23, 1-9

Abstract: Appropriate waste management is increasingly relevant due to environmental and infectious disease transmission concerns. An anonymous observational cross-sectional study was conducted from 2013–2017 of 262 tattooists and 824 beauticians throughout Poland. Knowledge, attitudes, behavior, and compliance with blood-borne infection controls and correct waste disposal were assessed. Tattooists correctly addressed hazardous waste significantly more often than did beauticians (83.3% vs. 44.8%). Medical waste was collected by a specialist company in 90.1% of tattoo parlors and 63.3%of beauty parlors. Tattooists correctly used and disposed of sharps more frequently than beauticians (93.1% vs. 68.9%); however, 46.4% of beauticians and 12.4% of tattooists discarded waste into municipal trash, including sharps (27.1% and 2.6%, respectively). Incorrect collection and labeling of biological waste present occupational risk to waste disposal personnel. Education and instructional controls could improve health safety in this industry. Biological waste management processes are restrictive for medical services and liberal for beauty services, an industry for which they should also be applied more comprehensively.

Keywords: professional infection risk; needle-stick injury; disposal of hazardous waste; tattoo parlors; beauty parlors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12673/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12673/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12673-:d:693060

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12673-:d:693060