Contemporary Neuroprotection Strategies during Cardiac Surgery: State of the Art Review
Palesa Motshabi-Chakane,
Palesa Mogane,
Jacob Moutlana,
Gontse Leballo-Mothibi,
Sithandiwe Dingezweni,
Dineo Mpanya and
Nqoba Tsabedze
Additional contact information
Palesa Motshabi-Chakane: Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
Palesa Mogane: Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
Jacob Moutlana: Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
Gontse Leballo-Mothibi: Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
Sithandiwe Dingezweni: Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
Dineo Mpanya: Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
Nqoba Tsabedze: Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 23, 1-18
Abstract:
Open-heart surgery is the leading cause of neuronal injury in the perioperative state, with some patients complicating with cerebrovascular accidents and delirium. Neurological fallout places an immense burden on the psychological well-being of the person affected, their family, and the healthcare system. Several randomised control trials (RCTs) have attempted to identify therapeutic and interventional strategies that reduce the morbidity and mortality rate in patients that experience perioperative neurological complications. However, there is still no consensus on the best strategy that yields improved patient outcomes, such that standardised neuroprotection protocols do not exist in a significant number of anaesthesia departments. This review aims to discuss contemporary evidence for preventing and managing risk factors for neuronal injury, mechanisms of injury, and neuroprotection interventions that lead to improved patient outcomes. Furthermore, a summary of existing RCTs and large observational studies are examined to determine which strategies are supported by science and which lack definitive evidence. We have established that the overall evidence for pharmacological neuroprotection is weak. Most neuroprotective strategies are based on animal studies, which cannot be fully extrapolated to the human population, and there is still no consensus on the optimal neuroprotective strategies for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Large multicenter studies using universal standardised neurological fallout definitions are still required to evaluate the beneficial effects of the existing neuroprotective techniques.
Keywords: neuroprotection; cerebrovascular; delirium; cardiac surgery; cardiac anaesthesia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12747/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12747/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12747-:d:694157
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().