Switzerland’s Narcotics Regulation Jungle: Off-Label Use, Counterfoil Prescriptions, and Opioid Agonist Therapy in the French-Speaking Cantons
Caroline Schmitt-Koopmann,
Carole-Anne Baud,
Valérie Junod and
Olivier Simon
Additional contact information
Caroline Schmitt-Koopmann: Service of Addiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, CH 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland
Carole-Anne Baud: Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, CH 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
Valérie Junod: Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, CH 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
Olivier Simon: Service of Addiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, CH 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland
IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 24, 1-11
Abstract:
The word “narcotic” is often first associated with “illicit drugs”. Yet, many “narcotic” and psychotropic substances are, in fact, medicines. Controlled medicines (CM) are products that meet the legal definition of both a “narcotic” under the Swiss Narcotics Act and of a medicine under the Therapeutic Products Act. We aim to examine how similar and how different, respectively, the implementation of CM regulations is throughout French-speaking Switzerland. Based on a legal analysis of the cantonal regulations, we conducted semi-structured interviews with cantonal pharmacists and cantonal physicians. We asked them how they perceive and implement the federal legal requirements. We find that some of these requirements have fallen into disuse, notably the federal duty to notify off-label use of CM. We observe that counterfoil prescriptions in their current paper format are a veritable data graveyard in the sense that they are not actively used to monitor or supervise the market. Moreover, we detect different conditions for opioid agonist treatment authorization. Some cantons require additional physicians’ training or written commitments by the person treated. Our mapping of the CM regulation implementation can serve as a basis for cantons to review their practices.
Keywords: public health; administration; regulation; narcotics; opioids; controlled medicines; opioid agonist treatments; off-label; counterfoil prescriptions; opioid informed consent (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13164/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13164/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13164-:d:701901
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().