EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Survival Outcomes and Predictors for Patients who Failed Chemoradiotherapy/Radiotherapy and Underwent Salvage Total Laryngectomy

Ming-Hsien Tsai, Hui-Ching Chuang, Yu-Tsai Lin, Tai-Lin Huang, Fu-Min Fang, Hui Lu and Chih-Yen Chien
Additional contact information
Ming-Hsien Tsai: Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
Hui-Ching Chuang: Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
Yu-Tsai Lin: Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
Tai-Lin Huang: Kaohsiung Chang Gung Head and Neck Oncology Group, Cancer Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
Fu-Min Fang: Kaohsiung Chang Gung Head and Neck Oncology Group, Cancer Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
Hui Lu: Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
Chih-Yen Chien: Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 2, 1-9

Abstract: Background: To assess the presence of adverse pathological features at the time of salvage total laryngectomy (TL) associated with oncologic outcome. Methods: Ninety patients with persistent/locally recurrent disease and who subsequently underwent salvage TL after definitive treatment by radiation alone (RTO) or concurrent chemo-radiation (CCRT) from 2009 to 2018 were retrospectively enrolled. Kaplan–Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion, positive margin, and stage IV disease were associated with worse survival in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of LVI and positive margin were both independent negative predictors in OS (LVI: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 2.537, 95% CI: 1.163–5.532, p = 0.019; positive margin: aHR = 5.68, 95% CI: 1.996–16.166, p = 0.001), DSS (LVI: aHR = 2.975, 95% CI: 1.228–7.206, p = 0.016); positive margin: aHR = 11.338, 95% CI: 2.438–52.733, p = 0.002), and DFS (LVI: aHR 2.705, 95% CI: 1.257–5.821, p = 0.011; positive margin (aHR = 6.632, 95% CI: 2.047–21.487, p = 0.002). Conclusions: The presence of LVI and positive margin were both associated with poor OS, DSS, and DFS among patients who underwent salvage TL after failure of RTO/CCRT. The role of adjuvant therapy for high-risk patients after salvage TL to improve the chance of survival requires more investigation in the future.

Keywords: lymphovascular invasion; surgical margin; prognosis; laryngeal cancer; hypopharyngeal cancer (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/371/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/371/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:371-:d:475479

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:371-:d:475479