Differences in Characteristics, Hospital Care and Outcomes between Acute Critically Ill Emergency Department Patients with Early and Late Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders

Julia Chia-Yu Chang, Che Yang, Li-Ling Lai, Ying-Ju Chen, Hsien-Hao Huang, Ju-Sing Fan, Teh-Fu Hsu and David Hung-Tsang Yen
Additional contact information
Julia Chia-Yu Chang: Department of Emergency Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
Che Yang: Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
Li-Ling Lai: Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
Ying-Ju Chen: Department of Emergency Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
Hsien-Hao Huang: Department of Emergency Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
Ju-Sing Fan: Department of Emergency Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
Teh-Fu Hsu: Department of Emergency Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
David Hung-Tsang Yen: Department of Emergency Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 3, 1-13

Abstract: Background : A do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order is associated with an increased risk of death among emergency department (ED) patients. Little is known about patient characteristics, hospital care, and outcomes associated with the timing of the DNR order. Aim : Determine patient characteristics, hospital care, survival, and resource utilization between patients with early DNR (EDNR: signed within 24 h of ED presentation) and late DNR orders. Design : Retrospective observational study. Setting/Participants : We enrolled consecutive, acute, critically ill patients admitted to the emergency intensive care unit (EICU) at Taipei Veterans General Hospital from 1 February 2018, to 31 January 2020. Results : Of the 1064 patients admitted to the EICU, 619 (58.2%) had EDNR and 445 (41.8%) LDNR. EDNR predictors were age >85 years (adjusted odd ratios (AOR) 1.700, 1.027–2.814), living in long-term care facilities (AOR 1.880, 1.066–3.319), having advanced cardiovascular diseases (AOR 2.128, 1.039–4.358), “medical staff would not be surprised if the patient died within 12 months” (AOR 1.725, 1.193–2.496), and patients’ family requesting palliative care (AOR 2.420, 1.187–4.935). EDNR patients underwent lesser endotracheal tube (ET) intubation (15.6% vs. 39.9%, p < 0.001) and had reduced epinephrine injection (19.9% vs. 30.3%, p = 0.009), ventilator support (16.7% vs. 37.9%, p < 0.001), and narcotic use (51.1% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.012). EDNR patients had significantly lower 7-day ( p < 0.001), 30-day ( p < 0.001), and 90-day ( p = 0.023) survival. Conclusions : EDNR patients underwent decreased ET intubation and had reduced epinephrine injection, ventilator support, and narcotic use during EOL as well as decreased length of hospital stay, hospital expenditure, and survival compared to LDNR patients.

Keywords: emergency department; intensive care unit; do-not-resuscitate; hospital care (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1028/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1028/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1028-:d:486263

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().