EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessing the Quality of Reporting to China’s National TB Surveillance Systems

Tao Li, Lijia Yang, Sarah E. Smith-Jeffcoat, Alice Wang, Hui Guo, Wei Chen, Xin Du and Hui Zhang
Additional contact information
Tao Li: National Center for TB Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
Lijia Yang: National Center for TB Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
Sarah E. Smith-Jeffcoat: Division of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
Alice Wang: Division of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
Hui Guo: Beijing Office, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100600, China
Wei Chen: National Center for TB Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
Xin Du: National Center for TB Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
Hui Zhang: National Center for TB Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 5, 1-13

Abstract: (1) Background: The reliability of disease surveillance may be restricted by sensitivity or ability to capture all disease. Objective: To quantify under-reporting and concordance of recording persons with tuberculosis (TB) in national TB surveillance systems: the Infectious Disease Reporting System (IDRS) and Tuberculosis Information Management System (TBIMS). (2) Methods: This retrospective review includes 4698 patients identified in 2016 in China. County staff linked TB patients identified from facility-specific health and laboratory information systems with records in IDRS and TBIMS. Under-reporting was calculated, and timeliness, concordance, accuracy, and completeness were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with under-reporting. (3) Results: We found that 505 (10.7%) patients were missing within IDRS and 1451 (30.9%) patients were missing within TBIMS. Of 171 patient records reviewed in IDRS and 170 patient records in TBIMS, 12.3% and 6.5% were found to be untimely, and 10.7% and 7.1% were found to have an inconsistent home address. The risk of under-reporting to both IDRS and TBIMS was greatest at tertiary health facilities and among non-residents; the risk of under-reporting to TBIMS was greatest with patients aged 65 or older and with extrapulmonary TB (EPTB). (4) Conclusions: It is important to improve the reporting and recording of TB patients. Local TB programs that focus on training, and mentoring high-burden hospitals, facilities that cater to EPTB, and migrant patients may improve reporting and recording.

Keywords: tuberculosis; surveillance; inventory study; under-reporting; accuracy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2264/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2264/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2264-:d:505458

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2264-:d:505458