EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation of the Role of Leisure Time Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Simultaneously on the Income-Overweight/Obesity Relationship

Layton Reesor-Oyer, Rosenda Murillo, Emily C. LaVoy, Daniel P. O’Connor, Yu Liu and Daphne C. Hernandez
Additional contact information
Layton Reesor-Oyer: Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
Rosenda Murillo: Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA
Emily C. LaVoy: Department of Health and Human Performance, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA
Daniel P. O’Connor: Health Research Institute, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA
Yu Liu: Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA
Daphne C. Hernandez: Department of Research, Jane and Robert Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 6, 1-10

Abstract: In the United States, overweight/obesity is more prevalent among those with low-income; higher income is related to greater leisure time physical activity (LTPA) and sedentary behavior (SB), which are inversely related to overweight/obesity. This study aimed to evaluate the role of LTPA and SB simultaneously in the income-overweight/obesity relationship. Cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007–2014) were utilized ( n = 10,348 non-older adults (aged 20–59 years)). A multiple mediator structural equation model was conducted to evaluate the indirect effects from income to overweight/obesity (Body Mass Index ≥25 kg/m 2 ) through LTPA and SB simultaneously, controlling for confounding variables, including diet, smoking, and alcohol consumption. As expected, greater income was negatively associated with overweight/obesity. Income indirectly influenced overweight/obesity through LTPA (Indirect effect: B = −0.005; CI = −0.01, −0.003), and through SB (Indirect effect: B = 0.008; CI = 0.005, 0.01), in opposing directions. The direct effect from income to overweight/obesity remained statistically significant. LTPA partially accounted for the negative relationship between income and overweight/obesity; SB reduced the strength of the negative relationship between income and overweight/obesity. Targeted behavior approaches for weight management may be beneficial. Increasing LTPA among adults with lower income and decreasing SB among adults with higher income may provide some overweight/obesity protection.

Keywords: body mass index; federal poverty level; National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; elevated weight status; exercise; health disparities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3127/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3127/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:3127-:d:519504

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-18
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:3127-:d:519504