The Therapeutic Relationship in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ying Mao, Wei Ning, Ning Zhang, Tao Xie, Jinnan Liu, Yongbo Lu and Bin Zhu
Additional contact information
Ying Mao: School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Wei Ning: School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Ning Zhang: School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Tao Xie: School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Jinnan Liu: School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Yongbo Lu: School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Bin Zhu: School of Public Health and Emergency Management, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 7, 1-19

Abstract: With a surge of conflicts between healthcare workers and patients in recent years, the therapeutic relationship (TR) in China is presently in tension. Meanwhile, consequent issues have begun to emerge, such as the distrust between healthcare workers and patients and the decline in the quality of medical services. Although many empirical studies about the TR have been conducted in China, previous studies on TR and its influencing factors have been contradictory. Therefore, this study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the current situation of the TR and to identify factors associated with the TR in Chinese hospitals from three perspectives (healthcare worker, patient, and therapeutic interaction). Two reviewers independently searched the literature, selected researches, and extracted data through comprehensively searching of three international electronic databases and three Chinese electronic databases to identify all relevant observational studies on influencing factors for TR in China published in English and Chinese from January 2000 to January 2020. Among the 3290 records initially identified, 11 studies met the selection criteria. A total of 96,906 individuals were included in the review. The results showed that 55.73% of healthcare workers consider the TR to be tense, and 33.7% of patients hold this view. The meta-analysis indicated that healthcare workers who were male, older, less educated, working in a non-surgical department, and had a senior title were more likely to be pessimistic about the TR. Patients who were rural residents, highly educated, and had no medical insurance were more likely to be pessimistic about the TR. Furthermore, the mutual trust could improve rapport between healthcare workers and patients. The 25 other related factors related to the TR were analyzed and described using a narrative approach. The findings might deserve consideration in the design of relative policies to promote harmony between doctors and patients.

Keywords: therapeutic relationship; medical disputes; determinants; systematic review; meta-analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3460/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3460/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3460-:d:524879

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().