A Participatory Intervention to Improve the Psychosocial Work Environment and Mental Health in Human Service Organisations. A Mixed Methods Evaluation Study

Emma Cedstrand, Anna Nyberg, Sara Sanchez-Bengtsson, Magnus Alderling, Hanna Augustsson, Theo Bodin, Helle Mölsted Alvesson and Gun Johansson
Additional contact information
Emma Cedstrand: Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
Anna Nyberg: Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
Sara Sanchez-Bengtsson: Center of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm Region, 113 65 Stockholm, Sweden
Magnus Alderling: Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
Hanna Augustsson: Medical Management Centre, Procome Research Group, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
Theo Bodin: Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
Helle Mölsted Alvesson: Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
Gun Johansson: Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 7, 1-19

Abstract: Work-related stress is a global problem causing suffering and economic costs. In Sweden, employees in human service occupations are overrepresented among persons on sick leave due to mental health problems such as stress-related disorders. The psychosocial work environment is one contributing factor for this problem, making it urgent to identify effective methods to decrease stress at the workplace. The aim of the study is to evaluate a participatory intervention to improve the psychosocial work environment and mental health using an embedded mixed methods design. The study is a controlled trial with a parallel process evaluation exploring fidelity and participants’ reactions to the intervention activities, experiences of learning and changes in behaviours and work routines. We collected data through documentation, interviews and three waves of questionnaires. Our results show small changes in behaviours and work routines and no positive effects of the intervention on the psychosocial work environment nor health outcomes. One explanation is end-users’ perceived lack of involvement over the process causing the intervention to be seen as a burden. Another explanation is that the intervention activities were perceived targeting the wrong organisational level. A representative participation over both content and process can be an effective strategy to change psychosocial working conditions and mental health.

Keywords: occupational health intervention; primary organisational intervention; mental health; psychosocial working conditions; process evaluation; effectiveness evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3546/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3546/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3546-:d:526218

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().