Psychological Responses According to Gender during the Early Stage of COVID-19 in Spain

Lucía del Río-Casanova, Milagrosa Sánchez-Martín, Ana García-Dantas, Anabel González-Vázquez and Ania Justo
Additional contact information
Lucía del Río-Casanova: Department of Psychiatry, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Milagrosa Sánchez-Martín: Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Dos Hermanas Campus, 41014 Sevilla, Spain
Ana García-Dantas: Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Dos Hermanas Campus, 41014 Sevilla, Spain
Anabel González-Vázquez: A Coruña University Hospital, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 15003 A Coruña, Spain
Ania Justo: Imaya Medical Institute (Private Therapy Clinic), 36204 Vigo, Spain

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 7, 1-20

Abstract: Background: Current research has pointed out an increased risk of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic in women compared to men, however the reason for this difference remains unclear. The aim of this research is to study early psychological responses to the pandemic in the Spanish general population, focusing on gender differences. Methods: Nine to 14 days after the declaration of a state of emergency an online survey was conducted assessing sociodemographic, health, behavioral and COVID-19-related variables. Mental health status was evaluated by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and the Self-Care Scale (SCS). Results: The study included 3520 respondents: 2611 women and 909 men. Women scored significantly higher in DASS-21 and IES-R ( p < 0.05) and were more likely to somatize, suffer from hypochondriasis, sleeping disturbances and claustrophobia ( p < 0.05). Being a woman can be considered a risk factor for intrusive thoughts, avoidance mechanisms, stress and anxiety ( Odd Ratio = 2.7/2.3/2.3/1.6). The risk of presenting posttraumatic symptoms and emotional distress was greater in women ( Odd Ratio = 6.77/4.59). General linear models to predict IES-R and DASS-21 scores clarified which variables were gender specific, such as main concerns. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that at early stages of the pandemic, women mental health was more impacted and that both genders show different concerns. Gender perspective in secondary and tertiary prevention strategies must be taken into account when facing the distress associated with the pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19 confinement; gender; mental health; psychological impact; quarantine consequences; post-traumatic stress (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3731/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3731/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3731-:d:529363

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().