Usability Evaluation of Slanted Computer Mice
Miguel L. Lourenço,
Fátima Lanhoso and
Denis A. Coelho
Additional contact information
Miguel L. Lourenço: Research Unit for Inland Development, Guarda Polytechnic Institute, 6300-559 Guarda, Portugal
Fátima Lanhoso: Centre for Mechanical and Aerospace Science and Technologies, Department of Electromechanical Engineering, Universidade da Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
Denis A. Coelho: Human Factors and Ergonomics Research Group, Department of Supply Chain and Operations Management, School of Engineering, Jönköping University, 551-11 Jönköping, Sweden
IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 8, 1-12
Abstract:
Prevention of musculoskeletal disorders is supported by use of slanted rather than horizontal pointing devices, but user acceptance of the former may be compromised due to lower perceived ease of use. This study compares subjectively rated usability (N = 37) for three sizes of slanted computer mice and includes a horizontal small conventional device as a reference. For a random subset of the sample ( n = 10), objective usability parameters were also elicited. Participants followed a standard protocol which is based on executing graphical pointing, steering, and dragging tasks generated by a purpose-built software. Subjective ratings were collected for each of the four pointing devices tested. The three slanted devices differed in size but were chosen because of an approximately similar slant angle (around 50–60 degrees relative to the horizontal plane). Additionally, effectiveness and efficiency were objectively calculated based on data recorded for the graphical tasks’ software for a random subset of the participants ( n = 10). The results unveil small differences in preference in some of the subjective usability parameters across hand size groups. This notwithstanding, the objective efficiency results are aligned with the subjective results, indicating consistency with the hypothesis that smaller slanted devices relative to the user’s hand size are easier to use than larger ones. Mean values of weighted efficiency recorded in the study range from 68% to 75%, with differences across devices coherent with preference rank orders.
Keywords: satisfaction; ease of use; computer mouse; preference; effort; discomfort; efficiency; effectiveness; usability; slanted pointing device (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3854/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3854/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:3854-:d:531306
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().