EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Human Thermal Responses in Temperate and Cold Environments

Yang Liu, Xiaoling Li, Jiarui Lai, Aibin Zhu, Xiaodong Zhang, Ziming Zheng, Huijin Zhu, Yueyang Shi, Long Wang and Zhangyi Chen
Additional contact information
Yang Liu: School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710000, China
Xiaoling Li: School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710000, China
Jiarui Lai: School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710000, China
Aibin Zhu: School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710000, China
Xiaodong Zhang: School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710000, China
Ziming Zheng: School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710000, China
Huijin Zhu: School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710000, China
Yueyang Shi: School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710000, China
Long Wang: School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710000, China
Zhangyi Chen: School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710000, China

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 8, 1-17

Abstract: The exoskeleton as functional wearable equipment has been increasingly used in working environments. However, the effects of wearing an exoskeleton on human thermal responses are still unknown. In this study, 10 male package handlers were exposed to 10 °C (COLD) and 25 °C (TEMP) ambient temperatures while performing a 10 kg lifting task (LIFTING) and sedentary (REST) both with (EXO) and without the exoskeleton (WEXO). Thermal responses, including the metabolic rate and mean skin temperature (MST), were continuously measured. Thermal comfort, thermal sensation and sweat feeling were also recorded. For LIFTING, metabolic heat production is significant decrease with the exoskeleton support. The MST and thermal sensation significantly increase when wearing the exoskeleton, but thermal discomfort and sweating are only aggravated in TEMP. For REST, MST and thermal sensation are also increased by the exoskeleton, and there is no significant difference in the metabolic rate between EXO and WEXO. The thermal comfort is significantly improved by wearing the exoskeleton only in COLD. The results suggest that the passive exoskeleton increases the local clothing insulation, and the way of wearing reduces the “pumping effect”, which makes a difference in the thermal response between COLD and TEMP. Designers need to develop appropriate usage strategies according to the operative temperature.

Keywords: exoskeleton; thermal response; metabolic heat production; thermal comfort; thermal sensation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3889/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3889/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:3889-:d:531937

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:3889-:d:531937