Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: The Possible Behavior of Greek Physicians, Midwives, and Nurses in Clinical Scenarios

Maria Dagla, Vasiliki Petousi and Antonios Poulios
Additional contact information
Maria Dagla: Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece
Vasiliki Petousi: Department of Sociology, University of Crete, 74100 Crete, Greece
Antonios Poulios: Department of Psychology, National Kapodestrian University, 10679 Athens, Greece

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 8, 1-12

Abstract: Background: This study investigates the acceptability, bioethical justification, and determinants of the provision of intensive care to extremely preterm or ill neonates among healthcare professionals serving in NICUs in Greek hospitals. Methods: Healthcare professionals (71 physicians, 98 midwives, and 82 nurses) employed full-time at all public Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) ( n = 17) in Greece were asked to report their potential behavior in three clinical scenarios. Results: The majority of healthcare professionals would start and continue intensive care to (a) an extremely preterm neonate, (b) a full-term neonate with an unfavorable prognosis, and (c) a neonate with complete phocomelia. In cases (a) and (b), midwives and nurses compared to physicians ( p = 0.009 and p = 0.004 in scenarios (a) and (b), respectively) and health professionals ascribing to the quality-of-life principle compared to those ascribing to the intrinsic value of life ( p = 0.001 and p = 0.01 scenarios (a) and (b) respectively), tend towards withholding or withdrawing care. Religion plays an important role in all three scenarios ( p = 0.005, p = 0.017 and p = 0.043, respectively). Conclusions: Understanding healthcare professionals’ therapeutic intensiveness in the face of NICU ethical dilemmas can improve NICU policies, support strategies, and, consequently, the quality of neonatal intensive care.

Keywords: end-of-life decision; neonatal care; NICU; intensive care; bioethical dilemmas (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3938/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3938/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:3938-:d:532728

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().