 Blood Lead Level and Renal Impairment among Adults: A Meta-AnalysisSaruda Kuraeiad and
Manas Kotepui
IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 8, 1-33 Abstract: Background: The adult population in lead-related occupations or environmentally exposed to lead may be at risk for renal impairment and lead nephropathy. This meta-analysis aims to determine the impact of blood lead level (BLL) on renal function among middle-aged participants. Methods: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, or cohort studies that reported BLL and renal function tests among adult participants were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science. Relevant studies were included and assessed for quality using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). The pooled mean BLL of participants with a high BLL (?30 µg/dL), moderate BLL (20–30 µg/dL), and low BLL (<20 µg/dL) was estimated using the random effects model. The pooled mean differences in BLL, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, uric acid, and creatinine clearance between the exposed and non-exposed participants were estimated using the random effects model. Meta-regression was performed to demonstrate the association between the effect size (ES) of the pooled mean BLL and renal function. Heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Q and I 2 statistics. Cochrane Q with a p value less than 0.05 and I 2 more than 50% demonstrated substantial heterogeneity among the studies included. Publication bias was assessed using the funnel plot between the effect size and standard error of the effect size. Results: Out of 1657 articles, 43 were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the pooled mean BLL in the participants with a high BLL, moderate BLL, and low BLL was 42.41 µg/dL (95% confidence interval (CI): 42.14–42.67, I 2 : 99.1%), 22.18 µg/dL (95% CI: 21.68–22.68, I 2 : 60.4%), and 2.9 µg/dL (95% CI: 2.9–2.9, I 2 : 100%), respectively. The mean BLL of the exposed participants was higher than that of the non-exposed participants (weighted mean difference (WMD): 25.5, p < 0.0001, 95% CI: 18.59–32.45, I 2 : 99.8%, 17 studies). The mean BUN (WMD: 1.66, p < 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.76–2.55, I 2 : 76%, 10 studies) and mean creatinine (WMD: 0.05, p = 0.007, 95% CI: 0.01–0.08, I 2 : 76.8%, 15 studies) in the exposed participants were higher than those in the non-exposed participants. The mean creatinine clearance in the exposed participants was lower than that in the non-exposed participants (standard mean difference (SMD): ?0.544, p = 0.03, 95% CI: ?1.035–(?0.054), I 2 : 96.2%). The meta-regression demonstrated a significant positive effect of BLL on BUN ( p = 0.022, coefficient: 0.75, constant: ?3.7, 10 studies). Conclusions: BLL was observed to be associated with abnormal renal function test parameters, including high BUN, high creatinine, and low creatinine clearance. Moreover, BUN seemed to be the most valuable prognostic marker for lead-induced renal impairment. Therefore, regular checks for renal function among lead-exposed workers should be a priority and publicly promoted. Keywords: blood lead level; renal insufficiency; renal impairment; BUN; creatinine (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4174-:d:536537 Access Statistics for this article IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu More articles in IJERPH from MDPI |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.