Occupational Radiation Exposure and Validity of National Dosimetry Registry among Korean Interventional Radiologists

Seulki Ko, Kwang Pyo Kim, Sung Bum Cho, Ye Jin Bang, Yae Won Ha and Won Jin Lee
Additional contact information
Seulki Ko: Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea
Kwang Pyo Kim: Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Gyeonggi-do 02447, Korea
Sung Bum Cho: Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea
Ye Jin Bang: Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea
Yae Won Ha: Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea
Won Jin Lee: Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 18, issue 8, 1-11

Abstract: The national dose registry (NDR) contains essential information to help protect radiation workers from radiation-related health risks and to facilitate epidemiological studies. However, direct validation of the reported doses has not been considered. We investigated the validity of the NDR with a personal dosimeter monitoring conducted among Korean interventional radiologists. Among the 56 interventional radiologists, NDR quarterly doses were compared with actively monitored personal thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) doses as standard measures of validation. We conducted analyses with participants categorized according to compliance with TLD badge-wearing policies. A correlation between actively monitored doses and NDR doses was low (Spearman ? = 0.06), and the mean actively monitored dose was significantly higher than the mean NDR dose (mean difference 0.98 mSv) in all participants. However, interventional radiologists who wore badges irregularly showed a large difference between actively monitored doses and NDR doses (mean difference 2.39 mSv), and participants who wore badges regularly showed no apparent difference between actively monitored doses and NDR doses (mean difference 0.26 mSv). This study indicated that NDR data underestimate the actual occupational radiation exposure, and the validity of these data varies according to compliance with badge-wearing policies. Considerable attention is required to interpret and utilize NDR data based on radiation workers’ compliance with badge-wearing policies.

Keywords: interventional radiology; ionizing radiation; thermoluminescent dosimetry; national dose registry; epidemiologic methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4195/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4195/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4195-:d:536757

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().