EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Pandemic-Induced Reductions on Swim Training Volume and Performance in Collegiate Swimmers

Gloria Martinez Perez, Matthew VanSumeren, Michael Brown and Tamara Hew-Butler
Additional contact information
Gloria Martinez Perez: Kinesiology, Health, and Sport Studies, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
Matthew VanSumeren: Kinesiology, Health, and Sport Studies, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
Michael Brown: Kinesiology, Health, and Sport Studies, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
Tamara Hew-Butler: Kinesiology, Health, and Sport Studies, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA

IJERPH, 2021, vol. 19, issue 1, 1-13

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant training disruptions during the 2020–2021 season, due to lockdowns, quarantines, and strict adherence to the pandemic protocols. The main purpose of this study was to determine how the pandemic training restrictions affected training volume and performance in one collegiate swim team. Cumulative training volume data across a 28-week season were compared between a pandemic (2020–2021) versus non-pandemic (2019–2020) season. The swimmers were categorized into three groups (sprinters, mid-distance, and long-distance) based on their training group. The performance times of 25 swimmers who competed in the regional championships, during both the non-pandemic and pandemic year, were compared via one-way ANOVA. Twenty-six male and 22 female swimmers commenced the 2020–2021 (pandemic) season, with 23% of the swimmers voluntarily opting out. Three COVID-19 cases were confirmed (2%) by the medical staff, with no long-term effects. Significant reductions in the average swim volume were verified in sprinters (32,867 ± 10,135 vs. 14,800 ± 7995 yards; p < 0.001), mid-distance (26,457 ± 10,692 vs. 17,054 ± 9.923 yards; p < 0.001), and long-distance (37,600 ± 14,430 vs. 22,254 ± 14,418 yards; p < 0.001) swimmers (non-pandemic vs. pandemic season, respectively). In the regional performance analyses, the sprinters swam faster ( n = 8; −0.5 ± 0.6 s), while the mid-distance ( n = 10; 0.17 ± 2.1 s) and long-distance ( n = 7; 6.0 ± 4.9 s) swimmers swam slower (F = 11.76; p = 0.0003; r 2 = 0.52). Thus, the pandemic caused significant reductions in swim training volume, with sprinters performing better and long-distance swimmers performing worse at the regional championships.

Keywords: swimming; COVID-19; swim performance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/164/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/164/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:164-:d:710158

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:164-:d:710158