Mapping the Concept, Content, and Outcome of Family-Based Outdoor Therapy for Children and Adolescents with Mental Health Problems: A Scoping Review
Tonje H. Stea,
Miek C. Jong,
Liv Fegran,
Ellen Sejersted,
Mats Jong,
Sophia L. H. Wahlgren and
Carina R. Fernee
Additional contact information
Tonje H. Stea: Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Sørlandet Hospital HE, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway
Miek C. Jong: National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
Liv Fegran: Department of Health and Nursing Science, University of Agder, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway
Ellen Sejersted: The Library, University of Agder, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway
Mats Jong: Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, 851 70 Sundsvall, Sweden
Sophia L. H. Wahlgren: Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Sørlandet Hospital HE, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway
Carina R. Fernee: Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Sørlandet Hospital HE, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway
IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 10, 1-22
Abstract:
Outdoor therapy and family-based therapy are suggested to be promising interventions for the treatment of mental health problems. The aim of the present scoping review was to systematically map the concept, content, and outcome of combining family- and outdoor-based therapy for children and adolescents with mental health problems. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA guidelines were applied. Eligible qualitative and quantitative studies were screened, included, and extracted for data. Seven studies were included. Findings from these studies indicated that family-based outdoor therapy programs have a positive impact on family- and peer relationships, adolescent behavior, mental health, self-perceptions (self-concept), school success, social engagement, and delinquency rates. However, participant characteristics, study design, and content and mode of delivery of the interventions varied substantially, hence preventing detailed comparison of outcomes across studies. In addition, most of the studies included few participants and lacked population diversity and comparable control groups. Although important ethical concerns were raised, such as non-voluntary participation in some of the programs, there was a lack of reporting on safety. This review indicates that a combination of family- and outdoor-based therapy may benefit mental health among children and adolescents, but due to the limited number of studies eligible for inclusion and high levels of heterogeneity, it was difficult to draw firm conclusions. Thus, future theory-based studies using robust designs are warranted.
Keywords: scoping review; outdoor therapy; family-based therapy; adolescents; mental health problems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/5825/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/5825/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:5825-:d:812569
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().