Informal Employment, Working Conditions, and Self-Perceived Health in 3098 Peruvian Urban Workers

Michael Silva-Peñaherrera, Amaya Ayala-Garcia, Erika Alferez Mayer, Iselle Sabastizagal-Vela and Fernando G. Benavides
Additional contact information
Michael Silva-Peñaherrera: Center for Research in Occupational Health (CiSAL), University Pompeu Fabra, Edificio PRBB, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
Amaya Ayala-Garcia: Center for Research in Occupational Health (CiSAL), University Pompeu Fabra, Edificio PRBB, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
Erika Alferez Mayer: Center for Research in Occupational Health (CiSAL), University Pompeu Fabra, Edificio PRBB, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
Iselle Sabastizagal-Vela: Instituto Nacional de Salud, Lima 15072, Peru
Fernando G. Benavides: Center for Research in Occupational Health (CiSAL), University Pompeu Fabra, Edificio PRBB, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 10, 1-9

Abstract: Peru has one of the highest informal employment rates in Latin America (73%). Previous studies have shown a higher prevalence of poor self-perceived health (P-SPH) in informal than in formal workers. The aim of this study was to analyze the role of working conditions in the association between informality and SPH in an urban working population in Peru. We conducted a cross-sectional study based on 3098 workers participating in the working conditions survey of Peru 2017. The prevalence of P-SPH and exposure to poor working conditions were calculated separately for formal and informal employment and were stratified by sex. Poisson regression models were used to assess the association between P-SPH and informal employment, with crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) for working conditions. Informal employment affected 76% of women and 66% of men. Informal workers reported higher exposition to poor working conditions than formal workers and reported worse SPH. Informal workers had a higher risk of P-SPH than formal workers: PR 1.38 [95% CI: 1.16–1.64] in women and PR 1.27 [95% CI: 1.08–1.49] in men. Adjustment by working conditions weakened the association in both sexes. In women, this association was only partially explained by worse working conditions; PR 1.23 [95% CI: 1.04–1.46]. Although some of the negative effect of informal employment on workers´ health can be explained by the characteristics of informality per se, such as poverty, a substantial part of this effect can be explained by poor working conditions.

Keywords: informality; working conditions; self-reported health; survey (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6105/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6105/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6105-:d:817642

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().