EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Determinants Affecting the Rationing of Nursing Care and Professional Burnout among Oncology Nurses

Aneta Piotrowska, Aleksandra Lisowska, Iwona Twardak, Karolina Włostowska, Izabella Uchmanowicz and Eleonora Mess
Additional contact information
Aneta Piotrowska: Department of Hematology and Transplantation, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, 53-439 Wroclaw, Poland
Aleksandra Lisowska: Department of Nursing and Obstetrics, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-618 Wroclaw, Poland
Iwona Twardak: Department of Nursing and Obstetrics, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-618 Wroclaw, Poland
Karolina Włostowska: Department of Cancer Prevention, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
Izabella Uchmanowicz: Department of Nursing and Obstetrics, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-618 Wroclaw, Poland
Eleonora Mess: Department of Nursing and Obstetrics, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-618 Wroclaw, Poland

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 12, 1-11

Abstract: Rationing of nursing care (RNC) is characterized by the omission of any aspect of the required patient care, resulting in incomplete or delayed nursing activities. Oncology nurses are exposed to a very high psychological burden, which can lead to the development of professional burnout syndrome (PBS). The level of PBS might be related to life and job satisfaction. This study aimed to identify determinants affecting RNC and reveal the relationship between RNC, life and job satisfaction, and the PBS levels among oncology nurses. The sample was a hundred oncology nurses from four hospitals in Poland with a mean age of 43.26 ± 10.69 years. The study was conducted from March 2019 to February 2020. The self-administered sociodemographic questionnaire and validated scales determining missed nursing care, job and life satisfaction, and life orientation were used: Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care-Revised (BERNCA-R), Satisfaction with Job Scale (SWJS), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), and Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). The mean BERNCA score was 1.55 ± 0.15, which indicates the frequency of RNC was between “never” and “rarely”. The mean SWJS score was 11.71 ± 5.97, which showed that nurses were “dissatisfied” and “rather dissatisfied” with their job. A low SWLS score was reported by 59% of nurses, which means that more than half of the respondents described their life satisfaction as low. In LOT-R, 66% of nurses reported pessimistic and 31% neutral life orientation. The mean overall MBI score was 49.27 ± 19.76 points (EE = 63.56 ± 25.37, DEP = 37.2 ± 24.95, and lack of PA = 47.05 ± 22.04), which means that half of the nurses perceived burnout and half did not. Additionally, the higher the job satisfaction (SWJS), the more frequent the RNC (BERNCA) ( p < 0.05). The greater the EE, the stronger the sense of lack of PA, and the higher the PBS (MBI) level, the less frequent the RNC (BERNCA). In conclusion, there is a phenomenon of omission of some aspects of care among oncology nurses, but it is not frequent and concerns areas not directly related to therapeutic tasks, but requiring effort and not resulting in quick noticeable effects. It depends only little on life satisfaction and more on job satisfaction and PBS level. The results may indicate the professionalism of Polish nurses, their responsibility towards their patients’ life and health, and the sense of mission that enables them to perform their duties regardless of the external and internal difficulties. The presence of the PBS phenomenon in oncology nurses highlights the need for continued research in this area.

Keywords: oncology nurses; rationing of nursing care; missed nursing care; professional burnout syndrome; life satisfaction; job satisfaction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7180/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7180/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7180-:d:836693

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7180-:d:836693