A Physiological-Signal-Based Thermal Sensation Model for Indoor Environment Thermal Comfort Evaluation

Shih-Lung Pao, Shin-Yu Wu, Jing-Min Liang, Ing-Jer Huang, Lan-Yuen Guo, Wen-Lan Wu, Yang-Guang Liu and Shy-Her Nian
Additional contact information
Shih-Lung Pao: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
Shin-Yu Wu: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
Jing-Min Liang: Department of Sports Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
Ing-Jer Huang: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
Lan-Yuen Guo: Department of Sports Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
Wen-Lan Wu: Department of Sports Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
Yang-Guang Liu: Green Energy & Environmental Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu 31040, Taiwan
Shy-Her Nian: Green Energy & Environmental Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu 31040, Taiwan

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 12, 1-16

Abstract: Traditional heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) control systems rely mostly on static models, such as Fanger’s predicted mean vote (PMV) to predict human thermal comfort in indoor environments. Such models consider environmental parameters, such as room temperature, humidity, etc., and indirect human factors, such as metabolic rate, clothing, etc., which do not necessarily reflect the actual human thermal comfort. Therefore, as electronic sensor devices have become widely used, we propose to develop a thermal sensation (TS) model that takes in humans’ physiological signals for consideration in addition to the environment parameters. We conduct climate chamber experiments to collect physiological signals and personal TS under different environments. The collected physiological signals are ECG, EEG, EMG, GSR, and body temperatures. As a preliminary study, we conducted experiments on young subjects under static behaviors by controlling the room temperature, fan speed, and humidity. The results show that our physiological-signal-based TS model performs much better than the PMV model, with average RMSEs 0.75 vs. 1.07 (lower is better) and R 2 0.77 vs. 0.43 (higher is better), respectively, meaning that our model prediction has higher accuracy and better explainability. The experiments also ranked the importance of physiological signals (as EMG, body temperature, ECG, and EEG, in descending order) so they can be selectively adopted according to the feasibility of signal collection in different application scenarios. This study demonstrates the usefulness of physiological signals in TS prediction and motivates further thorough research on wider scenarios, such as ages, health condition, static/motion/sports behaviors, etc.

Keywords: thermal sensation; thermal comfort; PMV (predicted mean vote); sensation modeling; personalized thermal comfort strategy; EMG; ECG; EEG; GSR; body temperature (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7292/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7292/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7292-:d:838462

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().