Physical Activity Behaviour and Comparison of GPAQ and Travel Diary Transport-Related Physical Activity in Accra, Ghana

Lambed Tatah, Matthew Pearce, Rahul Goel, Soren Brage, James Woodcock and Fidelia A. A. Dake
Additional contact information
Lambed Tatah: MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SL, UK
Matthew Pearce: MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SL, UK
Rahul Goel: Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Centre, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016, India
Soren Brage: MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SL, UK
James Woodcock: MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SL, UK
Fidelia A. A. Dake: Regional Institute for Population Studies, The University of Ghana, Legon, Accra P.O. Box LG 96, Ghana

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 12, 1-13

Abstract: There is a lack of data on physical activity (PA), active travel, and the comparison of measurement instruments in low-resource settings. The objective of this paper is to describe PA behaviour and the agreement of walking estimates from the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) and the travel diary in a low-resource setting. We used a cross-sectional survey design to capture data from the residents of Accra (Ghana) between May 2020 and March 2021. Of the 863 participants aged 15+ years, 65% were females, and 86% reported PA. The median weekly PA was 18 (interquartile range: 5–75) metabolic equivalent of task hours, with 50% of females and 37% of males achieving low PA levels. In the GPAQ, 80% of participants reported weekly walking; the mean number of days walked was 3.8 (standard deviation (SD): 2.5); hence, 54% of participants reported walking on any day, and the mean daily walking duration was 51 (SD: 82) minutes. In the diary, 56% of participants reported walking for over 24 h, with a mean walking duration of 31 (SD: 65) minutes. The correlation of walking duration between instruments was weak (rho: 0.31; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.25–0.37); the mean bias was 20 min, with GPAQ estimates being 0.1 to 9 times higher than diary estimates. We concluded that low PA is prevalent in Accra, and while the travel diary and GPAQ estimate similar walking prevalence, their walking duration agreement is poor. We recommend accompanying PA questionnaires with objective measures for calibration.

Keywords: transport physical activity; active travel; travel diary; GPAQ; Ghana (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7346/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7346/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7346-:d:839774

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().