Quantification of Recruit Training Demands and Subjective Wellbeing during Basic Military Training

Sean Bulmer, Jace R. Drain, Jamie L. Tait, Sean L. Corrigan, Paul B. Gastin, Brad Aisbett, Timo Rantalainen and Luana C. Main
Additional contact information
Sean Bulmer: Centre for Sport Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia
Jace R. Drain: Defence Science and Technology Group, Fishermans Bend 3207, Australia
Jamie L. Tait: Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia
Sean L. Corrigan: Centre for Sport Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia
Paul B. Gastin: La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3083, Australia
Brad Aisbett: Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia
Timo Rantalainen: Gerontology Research Centre and Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
Luana C. Main: Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 12, 1-10

Abstract: Purpose: Assess and describe the physical demands and changes in subjective wellbeing of recruits completing the 12 week Australian Army Basic Military Training (BMT) course. Methods: Thirty-five recruits (24.8 ± 6.8 y; 177.4 ± 10.1 cm, 75.6 ± 14.7 kg) consented to daily activity monitoring and weekly measures of subjective wellbeing (Multi-component Training Distress Scale, MTDS). The physical demands of training were assessed via wrist worn activity monitors (Actigraph GT9X accelerometer). Physical fitness changes were assessed by push-ups, sit-ups and multi-stage shuttle run in weeks 2 and 8. Results: All objective and subjective measures significantly changed ( p < 0.05) across the 12 week BMT course. In parallel, there was a significant improvement in measures of physical fitness from weeks 2 to 8 ( p < 0.001). The greatest disturbance to subjective wellbeing occurred during week 10, which was a period of field training. Weeks 6 and 12 provided opportunities for recovery as reflected by improved wellbeing. Conclusions: The physical demands of training varied across the Australian Army 12 week BMT course and reflected the intended periodization of workload and recovery. Physical fitness improved from week 2 to 8, indicating a positive training response to BMT. Consistent with findings in sport, wellbeing measures were sensitive to fluctuations in training stress and appear to have utility for individual management of personnel in the military training environment.

Keywords: soldier; army; self-report; monitoring; recruit; allostatic load (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7360/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7360/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7360-:d:839682

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().