Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review

Lucie Lipková, Michal Kumstát and Ivan Struhár
Additional contact information
Lucie Lipková: Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
Michal Kumstát: Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
Ivan Struhár: Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 13, 1-17

Abstract: Critical power represents an important parameter of aerobic function and is the highest average effort that can be sustained for a period of time without fatigue. Critical power is determined mainly in the laboratory. Many different approaches have been applied in testing methods, and it is a difficult task to determine which testing protocol it the most suitable. This review aims to evaluate all possible tests on bicycle ergometers or bicycles used to estimate critical power and to compare them. A literature search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) published from 2012 to 2022 and followed the PRISMA guidelines to process the review. Twenty-one articles met the eligibility criteria: records with trained or experienced endurance athletes (adults > 18), bicycle ergometer, a description of the testing protocol, and comparison of the tests. We found that the most widely used tests were the 3-min all-out tests set in a linear mode and the traditional protocol time to exhaustion. Some other alternatives could have been used but were not as regular. To summarize, the testing methods offered two main approaches in the laboratory (time to exhaustion test andthe 3-min all-out test with different protocols) and approach in the field, which is not yet completely standardized.

Keywords: critical work; methods; performance analysis; endurance athletes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7589/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7589/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7589-:d:844122

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().