Effects of a SMART Goal Setting and 12-Week Core Strength Training Intervention on Physical Fitness and Exercise Attitudes in Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Yijuan Lu, Kehong Yu and Xiaomei Gan
Additional contact information
Yijuan Lu: Department of Sport Science, College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Kehong Yu: Department of Sport Science, College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Xiaomei Gan: Department of Sport Science, College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 13, 1-19

Abstract: This study aimed to analyze the impacts of a 12-week core strength training (CST) and goal-setting (GS) program on the core endurance, agility, sprinting, jumping, grip strength, and exercise attitude in a group of adolescents. This study followed a randomized parallel design in which 362 adolescents (age: 14.5 ± 1.07 years; body mass index: 19.82 ± 3.64) were allocated to a GS ( n = 89), CST ( n = 92), or GS + CST ( n = 90) program or to a control group ( n = 91). Participants were assessed two times (baseline and postintervention) for the following tests: (i) 50 m dash, (ii) grip strength, (iii) long jump, (iv) 1000 m running for boys and 800 m for girls, (v) core endurance, and (vi) exercise attitude. Significant differences ( p < 0.05, η 2 p = 0.035−0.218) were found between the four groups of the six components of physical fitness and the three components of attitude toward exercise (target attitudes, behavioral habits, and sense of behavioral control). Between-group analysis revealed that the GS + CST had significant advantages ( p < 0.05) over the CON in terms of the 50 m dash ( Cohen’s d = 0.06), grip strength ( Cohen’s d = 0.19_left, 0.31_right), 800/1000 m running ( Cohen’s d = 0.41), core endurance ( Cohen’s d = 0.95), and sense of behavioral control ( Cohen’s d = 0.35). Between-group analysis also revealed that the CST had significant advantages over the CON in terms of grip strength ( Cohen’s d = 0.27_left, 0.39_right), 50 m ( Cohen’s d = 0.04), long jump ( Cohen’s d = 0.21), 800/1000 m ( Cohen’s d = 0.09), and core stability ( Cohen’s d = 0.63), which were significantly different from CON ( p < 0.05). GS differed from CON only on 50 m ( Cohen’s d = 0.02) and core stability ( Cohen’s d = 0.13) with a small effect ( p < 0.05). We conclude that the combined intervention of GS and CST is more effective in promoting fitness in adolescents, i.e., GS + CST > CST and GS + CST > GS.

Keywords: student; RCT; physical ability; attitude; core stability; target setting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7715/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7715/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7715-:d:846121

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().