EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

From the Triage to the Intermediate Area: A Simple and Fast Model for COVID-19 in the Emergency Department

Erika Poggiali, Enrico Fabrizi, Davide Bastoni, Teresa Iannicelli, Claudia Galluzzo, Chiara Canini, Maria Grazia Cillis, Davide Giulio Ponzi, Andrea Magnacavallo and Andrea Vercelli
Additional contact information
Erika Poggiali: Emergency Department, “Guglielmo da Saliceto” Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
Enrico Fabrizi: DISES & DSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 29122 Piacenza, Italy
Davide Bastoni: Emergency Department, “Guglielmo da Saliceto” Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
Teresa Iannicelli: Emergency Department, “Guglielmo da Saliceto” Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
Claudia Galluzzo: Emergency Department, “Guglielmo da Saliceto” Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
Chiara Canini: Emergency Department, “Guglielmo da Saliceto” Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
Maria Grazia Cillis: Emergency Department, “Guglielmo da Saliceto” Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
Davide Giulio Ponzi: Emergency Department, “Guglielmo da Saliceto” Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
Andrea Magnacavallo: Emergency Department, “Guglielmo da Saliceto” Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
Andrea Vercelli: Emergency Department, “Guglielmo da Saliceto” Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 13, 1-14

Abstract: Introduction: The early identification of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection is still a real challenge for emergency departments (ED). First, we aimed to develop a score, based on the use of the lung ultrasonography (LUS), in addition to the pre-triage interview, to correctly address patients; second, we aimed to prove the usefulness of a three-path organization (COVID-19, not-COVID-19 and intermediate) compared to a two-path organization (COVID-19, non-COVID-19). Methods: We retrospectively analysed 292 patients admitted to our ED from 10 April to 15 April 2020, with a definite diagnosis of positivity (93 COVID-19 patients) or negativity (179 not-COVID-19 patients) for SARS-COV-2 infection. Using a logistic regression, we found a set of predictors for infection selected from the pre-triage interview items and the LUS findings, which contribute with a different weight to the final score. Then, we compared the organization of two different pathways. Results: The most informative factors for classifying the patient are known nasopharyngeal swab positivity, close contact with a COVID-19 patient, fever associated with respiratory symptoms, respiratory failure, anosmia or dysgeusia, and the ultrasound criteria of diffuse alveolar interstitial syndrome, absence of B-lines and presence of pleural effusion. Their sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC-ROC are, respectively, 0.83, 0.81, 0.82 and 0.81. The most significant difference between the two pathways is the percentage of not-COVID-19 patients assigned to the COVID-19 area, that is, 10.6% (19/179) in the three-path organization, and 18.9% (34/179) in the two-path organization ( p = 0.037). Conclusions: Our study suggests the possibility to use a score based on the pre-triage interview and the LUS findings to correctly manage the patients admitted to the ED, and the importance of an intermediate area to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the ED and, as a consequence, in the hospital.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; lung ultrasound; emergency department; triage; score (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/8070/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/8070/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:8070-:d:853147

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:8070-:d:853147