Are Iron Tailings Suitable for Constructing the Soil Profile Configuration of Reclaimed Farmland? A Soil Quality Evaluation Based on Chronosequences

Wenjuan Jin, Han Wu, Zhongyi Wei, Chunlan Han, Zhenxing Bian and Xufeng Zhang
Additional contact information
Wenjuan Jin: College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
Han Wu: College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
Zhongyi Wei: College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
Chunlan Han: College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
Zhenxing Bian: College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
Xufeng Zhang: College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 14, 1-18

Abstract: Iron tailings used as soil substitute materials to construct reclaimed farmland soil can effectively realize the large-scale resource utilization of iron tailings and reduce environmental risks. It is vital to understand the mechanisms affecting reclaimed soil quality and determine the appropriate pattern for reclamation with iron tailings. Thus, a soil quality index (SQI) was developed to evaluate the soil quality of reclaimed farmland with iron tailings in a semi-arid region. Soil samples were collected from two reclamation measures (20 cm subsoil + 20 cm iron tailings + 30 cm topsoil and 20 cm subsoil + 20 cm iron tailings + 50 cm topsoil) with reclamation years of 3 (R3), 5 (R5), and 10 (R10) at three soil depths (0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm) to measure 13 soil physicochemical properties in western Liaoning, China. Adjacent normal farmland (NF) acted as a reference. Results indicated that iron tailings were suitable for constructing the soil profile configuration of reclaimed farmland. SQI of reclaimed soil increased with the reclamation year, but it has not reached the NF level after 3 years, while it was better than NF after 5 years. The nutrient content of reclaimed soil increased with the reclamation year, but it still did not reach the NF level after 10 years. SQI of R10 (with 50 cm topsoil) was also better than NF but slightly lower than R5 (with 30 cm topsoil). For the semi-arid region with sticky soil texture, the topsoil thickness of reclamation was not the thicker the better, and 30 cm topsoil covered on iron tailings in western Liaoning could achieve a better reclamation effect than 50 cm.

Keywords: land reclamation; solid waste reuse; soil reconstruction; soil quality index (SQI); reclamation years (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8235/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8235/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8235-:d:856676

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().