Exhaustion in Healthcare Workers after the First Three Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Marina Ruxandra Oțelea,
Agripina Rașcu,
Cătălin Staicu,
Lavinia Călugăreanu,
Mădălina Ipate,
Silvia Teodorescu,
Ovidiu Persecă,
Angelica Voinoiu,
Andra Neamțu,
Violeta Calotă and
Dana Mateș
Additional contact information
Marina Ruxandra Oțelea: Clinical Department 5, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
Agripina Rașcu: Clinical Department 5, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
Cătălin Staicu: National Center for Monitoring Community Risks, National Institute of Public Health, 050463 Bucharest, Romania
Lavinia Călugăreanu: National Center for Monitoring Community Risks, National Institute of Public Health, 050463 Bucharest, Romania
Mădălina Ipate: Regional Center of Public Health, National Institute of Public Health, 700465 Iași, Romania
Silvia Teodorescu: National Center for Monitoring Community Risks, National Institute of Public Health, 050463 Bucharest, Romania
Ovidiu Persecă: Regional Center for Public Health, National Institute of Public Health, 400349 Cluj Napoca, Romania
Angelica Voinoiu: National Center for Monitoring Community Risks, National Institute of Public Health, 050463 Bucharest, Romania
Andra Neamțu: National Center for Monitoring Community Risks, National Institute of Public Health, 050463 Bucharest, Romania
Violeta Calotă: National Center for Monitoring Community Risks, National Institute of Public Health, 050463 Bucharest, Romania
Dana Mateș: National Center for Monitoring Community Risks, National Institute of Public Health, 050463 Bucharest, Romania
IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 14, 1-15
Abstract:
This study aims to identify the determinants of exhaustion of frontline and second-line healthcare workers (HCW) during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A case–control study was conducted based on an anonymously distributed questionnaire, which was completed by 1872 HCW. Exhaustion was assessed with a validated Romanian questionnaire. The Siegrist questionnaire was used to determine workload, reward and overcommitment. Frontline HCW reported significantly more frequent longer working hours ( p = 0.0009) and a better perception of the management of the risk for infection ( p = 0.0002) than second-line HCW. The effort and overcommitment scores were higher in frontline HCW (9.51 + 1.98 vs. 8.45 + 21, p < 0.001 and 16.34 ± 2.80 vs. 15.24 ± 2.94, p < 0.001, respectively) and the reward scores were lower (5.21 ± 1.522 vs. 5.99 ± 1.44, p < 0.001). In the fully adjusted regression model, age, imbalance between effort and reward, overcommitment and management of the risk of infection in the workplace were associated with the exhaustion score in each category of HCW. The number of working hours was correlated with exhaustion in frontline HCW and occupation in second-line HCW. There were more similarities than differences between frontline and second-line HCW. Even if frontline HCW had a higher risk of exhaustion, the risk was not negligible for all HCW.
Keywords: exhaustion; healthcare workers; COVID-19; effort/reward score; overcommitment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8871/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8871/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8871-:d:868474
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().