US Adults’ Perceptions of Dog Breed Bans, Dog Aggression and Breed-Specific Laws

Lori R. Kogan (), Wendy Packman, Phyllis Erdman, Jennifer Currin-McCulloch and Cori Bussolari
Additional contact information
Lori R. Kogan: Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Wendy Packman: Department of Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
Phyllis Erdman: College of Education, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163, USA
Jennifer Currin-McCulloch: School of Social Work, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Cori Bussolari: Counseling Psychology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 16, 1-15

Abstract: Dog aggression directed towards people is a leading reason for relinquishment and a major public health hazard. In response to the threat of dog aggression and dog bites, breed-specific legislation has been introduced in numerous cities within the United States and countries throughout the world. There is limited evidence, however, to suggest that such laws are effective. This study explored, through an online, anonymous, cross-sectional survey, US residents’ views about the bite risk of common dog breeds, breed-specific legislation, and alternative options for improved public safety. A total of 586 surveys were completed by adult US residents, 48.8% female and 48.6% male. Approximately half of the respondents reported feeling that dog bites are a serious public health issue. Although 70% of respondents were opposed to a breed ban, only 56% felt that banning specific breeds creates an animal welfare issue. Females were less likely to support a ban or agree that specific breed bans improve public safety. When participants were asked to indicate their support of several alternatives to breed-specific legislation, the most frequently endorsed options included public education about animal welfare and animal behavior, and stricter leash laws. Further research pertaining to the most effective public education dissemination methods is warranted.

Keywords: breed; breed ban; Pit Bull; dog bites; dog aggression; breed-specific laws (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10138/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10138/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10138-:d:889488

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().