Effect of Teaching Methods on Motor Efficiency, Perceptions and Awareness in Children

Gaetano Raiola (), Tiziana D’Isanto, Felice Di Domenico and Francesca D’Elia
Additional contact information
Gaetano Raiola: Department of Political and Social Studies, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Salerno, Italy
Tiziana D’Isanto: Department of Human, Philosophical and Education Sciences, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Salerno, Italy
Felice Di Domenico: Department of Political and Social Studies, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Salerno, Italy
Francesca D’Elia: Department of Human, Philosophical and Education Sciences, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Salerno, Italy

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 16, 1-10

Abstract: Currently, physical inactivity and sedentariness in children are becoming increasingly common, resulting in children’s poor ability to perform basic motor patterns. It is important to find strategies that instructors can adopt to improve awareness of the importance of physical activity for health and wellness, as well as motor efficiency. Two teaching methods can be used: prescriptive teaching and heuristic learning. The aim of this study was to compare these two methods to determine which is the most suitable for developing motor efficiency. An additional aim was to verify the children’s level of enjoyment and self-efficacy through questions on perceptions and, subsequently, on awareness of the activity performed distinctly from perception. The sample consisted of 28 children randomly divided into two groups: HEUR-L, performing activities using heuristic learning, a basic method in ecological approach; and PRES-T, using prescriptive teaching, a basic cognitive method. A motor-efficiency test (TEM) and a survey were administered. A two-way ANOVA with repeated measures was used to test differences in motor efficiency. A Chi-square (χ 2 ) test was used to compare differences between groups in terms of perceptions in enjoyment and self-efficacy and, on a second test, awareness of the activity performed. The results were statistically significant ( p < 0.05). Both teaching methods improved motor efficiency, although HEUR-L did so to a greater extent. Differences in perception were found in terms of enjoyment and self-efficacy ( p < 0.05), whereas there was no difference in terms of awareness ( p > 0.05). Although both methodologies led to improvements in motor-pattern development, heuristic learning was found to be the most effective method to improve motor efficiency, relationships and self-efficacy.

Keywords: sedentariness; motor patterns; teaching methods; extracurricular activities; PA (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10287/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10287/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10287-:d:891825

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().