Systematic Bias in Self-Reported Social Media Use in the Age of Platform Swinging: Implications for Studying Social Media Use in Relation to Adolescent Health Behavior

Sarah C. Boyle (), Sebastian Baez, Bradley M. Trager and Joseph W. LaBrie
Additional contact information
Sarah C. Boyle: HeadsUP Labs, Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA
Sebastian Baez: HeadsUP Labs, Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA
Bradley M. Trager: HeadsUP Labs, Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA
Joseph W. LaBrie: HeadsUP Labs, Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 16, 1-15

Abstract: Public health researchers are increasingly interested in the potential relationships between social media (SM) use, well-being, and health behavior among adolescents. However, most research has assessed daily SM time via self-report survey questions, despite a lack of clarity around the accuracy of such reports given the current tendency of youth to access SM on multiple electronic devices and cycle between multiple SM platforms on a daily basis (i.e., platform swinging). The current study investigates the potential for systematic reporting biases to skew findings. Three hundred and twenty incoming college students downloaded software on their computers, tablets, and smartphones to track their active use of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat over a 2-week surveillance period and then self-reported their average daily minutes on each platform immediately after. Larger proportions of students over-estimated than under-estimated their use, with the largest overestimations found on the most heavily used platforms. Females logged significantly more SM time and were less accurate in reporting than were males and, independently, the likelihood of substantial inaccuracies in reporting total SM time and time on most individual platforms increased with each additional SM platform participants reported using. Findings demonstrate that self-reported estimates of SM time among adolescents in the age of SM platform swinging are prone to substantial error and may lead to biased conclusions about relationships between variables. Alternative measurement approaches are suggested to improve the validity of future research in this area.

Keywords: social media use; adolescence; objective assessment; self-report assessment; validity; platform swinging (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9847/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9847/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9847-:d:884566

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().