EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Long-Term Effects of a Kinematic Bikefitting Method on Pain, Comfort, and Fatigue: A Prospective Cohort Study

Robson Dias Scoz (), Paulo Rui de Oliveira, Cleyton Salvego Santos, Júlia Ribeiro Pinto, Cesar Augusto Melo-Silva, André Filipe Teixeira de Júdice, José João Baltazar Mendes, Luciano Maia Alves Ferreira and César Ferreira Amorim
Additional contact information
Robson Dias Scoz: Programs in Physical Therapy, University City of Sao Paulo (UNICID), Sao Paulo 05508-030, Brazil
Paulo Rui de Oliveira: Programs in Physical Therapy, University City of Sao Paulo (UNICID), Sao Paulo 05508-030, Brazil
Cleyton Salvego Santos: Programs in Physical Therapy, University City of Sao Paulo (UNICID), Sao Paulo 05508-030, Brazil
Júlia Ribeiro Pinto: Programs in Physical Therapy, University City of Sao Paulo (UNICID), Sao Paulo 05508-030, Brazil
Cesar Augusto Melo-Silva: Medical Sciences Program, Brasilia University, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil
André Filipe Teixeira de Júdice: Interdisciplinary Investigation Center Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Laboratory of Physical and Functional Assessment in Physiotherapy (LAFFFi), 2829-511 Monte de Caparica, Setubal, Portugal
José João Baltazar Mendes: Interdisciplinary Investigation Center Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Laboratory of Physical and Functional Assessment in Physiotherapy (LAFFFi), 2829-511 Monte de Caparica, Setubal, Portugal
Luciano Maia Alves Ferreira: Interdisciplinary Investigation Center Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Laboratory of Physical and Functional Assessment in Physiotherapy (LAFFFi), 2829-511 Monte de Caparica, Setubal, Portugal
César Ferreira Amorim: Programs in Physical Therapy, University City of Sao Paulo (UNICID), Sao Paulo 05508-030, Brazil

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 19, 1-14

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to analyze the long-term riders’ subjective responses to a standardized bikefitting method on their bicycles. Eighty-six amateur mountain bikers had their riding posture and bicycle components ergonomically adjusted through a 3D kinematic bikefitting method. Validated subjective scales (Feeling, OMNI, and Numerical Rating Pain Scale) were used to assess their overall riding comfort and fatigue along with localized pain for six body parts. Data were collected just before intervention (baseline or pre), immediately after (or post), and 30, 60, 90, and 120 days after the bikefit session. A Student’s t -test comparing before bikefit and after 120 days showed significant ( p < 0.05) reduction in localized pain for all six body parts and riding comfort along with a large effect size effect ( d = 1.18) for riding comfort. Although initially reduced, fatigue scores gradually increased over the months, showing a high correlation (r = 0.946) with increased monthly training volume. In conclusion, overall riding discomfort and pain were significantly decreased after a standardized kinematic bikefit session even after 120 days post intervention. However, fatigue scores began to rise after 30 days, showing a high correlation with increasing monthly training volume.

Keywords: kinematics; bicycling; mountain biking; sports equipment; bike-fit; comfort; pain; fatigue (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12949/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12949/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12949-:d:937743

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12949-:d:937743