What’s behind the Dashboard? Intervention Mapping of a Mobility Outcomes Monitoring System for Rehabilitation

Claudine Auger (), Cassioppée Guay, Alex Pysklywec, Nathalie Bier, Louise Demers, William C. Miller, Dominique Gélinas-Bronsard and Sara Ahmed
Additional contact information
Claudine Auger: Faculty of Medicine, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
Cassioppée Guay: Faculty of Medicine, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
Alex Pysklywec: Faculty of Medicine, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
Nathalie Bier: Faculty of Medicine, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
Louise Demers: Faculty of Medicine, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
William C. Miller: Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
Dominique Gélinas-Bronsard: Faculty of Medicine, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
Sara Ahmed: Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montréal, QC H3S 1M9, Canada

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 20, 1-20

Abstract: Training and follow-up for older adults who received new assistive technology can improve device use adoption and function, but there is a lack of systematic and coordinated services. To address this gap, the Internet-based MOvIT+™ was designed to provide remote monitoring and support for assistive technology users and their caregivers. This paper presents the intervention mapping approach that was used. In step 1, we established a project governance structure and a logic model emerged from interviews with stakeholders and a systematic review of literature. In step 2, a modified TRIAGE consensus process led to the prioritization of thirty-six intervention components. In step 3, we created use cases for all intervention end users. In step 4, the intervention interface was created through iterative lab testing, and we gathered training resources. In step 5, a two-stage implementation plan was devised with the recruited rehabilitation sites. In step 6, we proposed an evaluation protocol. This detailed account of the development of MOvIT+™ demonstrates how the combined use of an intervention mapping approach and participatory processes with end users can help linking evidence-based, user-centered, and pragmatic reasoning. It makes visible the complexities behind the development of Internet-based interventions, while guiding future program developers.

Keywords: internet-based interventions; intervention mapping; self-management devices; remote assistance; remote monitoring (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13303/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13303/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13303-:d:943179

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().