Integrated Patterns of Subjective Job Insecurity: A Multigroup Person-Centered Study

Valerio Ghezzi (), Valeria Ciampa, Tahira M. Probst, Laura Petitta, Ivan Marzocchi, Ilaria Olivo and Claudio Barbaranelli
Additional contact information
Valerio Ghezzi: Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Rome, Italy
Valeria Ciampa: Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Rome, Italy
Tahira M. Probst: Department of Psychology, Washington State University Vancouver, 14204 NE Salmon Creek Avenue, Vancouver, WA 98686-9600, USA
Laura Petitta: Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Rome, Italy
Ivan Marzocchi: Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Rome, Italy
Ilaria Olivo: Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Rome, Italy
Claudio Barbaranelli: Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Rome, Italy

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 20, 1-20

Abstract: Past research attests to the pivotal role of subjective job insecurity (JI) as a major stressor within the workplace. However, most of this research has used a variable-centered approach to evaluate the relative importance of one (or more) JI facets in explaining employee physical and psychological well-being. Relatively few studies have adopted a person-centered approach to investigate how different appraisals of JI co-occur within employees and how these might lead to the emergence of distinct latent profiles of JI, and, moreover, how those profiles might covary with well-being, personal resources, and performance. Using conservation of resources (COR) theory as our overarching theoretical framework and latent profile analysis as our methodological approach, we sought to fill this gap. To evaluate the external validity of our study results, we used employee sample data from two different countries (Italy and the USA) with, respectively, n = 743 and n = 494 employees. Results suggested the emergence of three profiles (i.e., the “secure”, the “average type”, and the “insecure”) in both country samples. The “secure” group systematically displayed a less vulnerable profile in terms of physical and psychological well-being, self-rated job performance, positive orientation, and self-efficacy beliefs than the “insecure” group, while the “average” type position on the outcomes’ continua was narrower. Theoretically, this supports COR’s notion of loss spirals by suggesting that differing forms of JI appraisals tend to covary within-person. Practical implications in light of labor market trends and the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed.

Keywords: cognitive job insecurity; affective job insecurity; person-centered approach; latent profile analysis; employee well-being (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13306/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13306/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13306-:d:943270

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().