Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation
Álvaro Montes,
Jéssica Sanmarco,
Mercedes Novo,
Blanca Cea and
Ramón Arce ()
Additional contact information
Álvaro Montes: Unidad de Psicología Forense, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Jéssica Sanmarco: Unidad de Psicología Forense, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Mercedes Novo: Unidad de Psicología Forense, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Blanca Cea: Unidad de Psicología Forense, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Ramón Arce: Unidad de Psicología Forense, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 21, 1-9
Abstract:
The prevalence of traditional bullying victimization has been estimated at around 36%, while that of cyberbullying has been estimated at 15%. The victimization of bullying brings with it harm to mental health that must be compensated for, after a forensic evaluation, by the aggressor or legal guardian. Thus, a meta-analytic review was undertaken with the aim of knowing the effect of bullying victimization on psychological harm, as well as quantifying the magnitude of the harm and estimating the probability that no harm associated with bullying victimization is generated. Method: A random-effects correlational meta-analysis correcting effect size by sampling error and criterion and predictor unreliability was performed. Results: The results exhibited a positive (i.e., more victimization and more psychological harm) and significant mean true effect size, implying an average psychological harm associated to bullying victimization of 29.7%. Nevertheless, 26.7% of students victimized by bullying did not develop psychological harm. Conclusions: Bullying victimization causes psychological harm, with an average increase in psychological harm associated with bullying victimization of 29.7%.
Keywords: mental harm; restitution; compensation; victim of crimes; forensic psychological evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13852/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13852/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13852-:d:952360
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().