EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework

Sara Hudson (), Dennis Foley and Margaret Cargo
Additional contact information
Sara Hudson: Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari St., Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia
Dennis Foley: School of Management, Faculty of Business, Government and Law, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari St., Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia
Margaret Cargo: Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari St., Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 21, 1-28

Abstract: Indigenous people and communities are establishing social enterprises to address social disadvantage and overcome health inequities in their communities. This review sought to characterize the spectrum of Indigenous social enterprises in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States to identify the operational models and cultural values that underpin them and their impact on Indigenous health and wellbeing. The scoping review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s six-stage methodological framework with recommended enhancements by Levac et al. underpinned by Indigenous Standpoint Theory, and an Indigenous advisory group to provide cultural oversight and direction. Of the 589 documents screened 115 documents were included in the review. A conceptual framework of seven different operational models of Indigenous social enterprises was developed based on differing levels of Indigenous ownership, control, and management: (1) individual, (2) collective, (3) delegative, (4) developmental, (5) supportive, (6) prescriptive and (7) paternalistic. Models with 100% Indigenous ownership and control were more likely to contribute to improved health and wellbeing by increasing self-determination and strengthening culture and promoting healing than others. Indigenous social enterprises could offer a more holistic and sustainable approach to health equity and health promotion than the siloed, programmatic model common in public health policy.

Keywords: Indigenous social enterprise; Indigenous research methodologies; health and wellbeing; self-determination; cultural values; cultural and social determinants of health; hybridity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14478/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14478/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14478-:d:963524

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14478-:d:963524