Comparison of Several Prediction Equations Using Skinfold Thickness for Estimating Percentage Body Fat vs. Body Fat Percentage Determined by BIA in 6–8-Year-Old South African Children: The BC–IT Study

Lynn Moeng-Mahlangu, Makama A. Monyeki (), John J. Reilly and Herculina S. Kruger
Additional contact information
Lynn Moeng-Mahlangu: Physical Activity, Sport and Recreation Research Focus Area (PhASRec), Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa
Makama A. Monyeki: Physical Activity, Sport and Recreation Research Focus Area (PhASRec), Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa
John J. Reilly: Physical Activity for Health Group, School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK
Herculina S. Kruger: Centre of Excellence for Nutrition, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 21, 1-15

Abstract: Body composition measurement is useful for assessing percentage body fat (%BF) and medical diagnosis, monitoring disease progression and response to treatment, and is essential in assessing nutritional status, especially in children. However, finding accurate and precise techniques remains a challenge. The study compares %BF determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and calculated from available prediction equations based on skinfolds in young South African children. A cross-sectional study performed on 202 children (83 boys and 119 girls) aged 6–8 years. Height and weight, triceps and subscapular skinfolds were determined according to standard procedures. %BF was determined with BIA and three relevant available equations. SPSS analyzed the data using paired samples tests, linear regression, and Bland–Altman plots. Significant paired mean differences were found for BIA and Slaughter (t 201 = 33.896, p < 0.001), Wickramasinghe (t 201 = 4.217, p < 0.001), and Dezenberg (t 201 = 19.910, p < 0.001). For all of the equations, the standards for evaluating prediction errors (SEE) were above 5. The Bland–Altman plots show relatively large positive and negative deviations from the mean difference lines and trends of systematic under- and over-estimation of %BF across the %BF spectrum. All three equations demonstrated a smaller %BF than the %BF measured by BIA, but the difference was smallest with the Wickramasinghe equation. In comparison, a poor SEE was found in the three %BF predicted equations and %BF derived from BIA. As such, an age-specific %BF equation incorporating criterion methods of deuterium dilution techniques or ‘gold-standard’ methods is needed to refute these findings. However, in the absence of developed %BF equations or ‘gold-standard’ methods, the available prediction equations are still desirable.

Keywords: body composition; skinfold thickness; bioeletrical impedance analysis; adiposity; children (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14531/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14531/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14531-:d:964372

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().