EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Identification of Responders to Balneotherapy among Adults over 60 Years of Age with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study with Trajectory Model Analysis

Benjamin Raud, Charlotte Lanhers, Cindy Crouzet, Bénédicte Eschalier, François Bougeard, Anna Goldstein, Bruno Pereira and Emmanuel Coudeyre ()
Additional contact information
Benjamin Raud: Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
Charlotte Lanhers: Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
Cindy Crouzet: Département de Médecine Générale, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
Bénédicte Eschalier: Département de Médecine Générale, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
François Bougeard: Département de Médecine Générale, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
Anna Goldstein: Unité de Biostatistique, Délégation Recherche Clinique et Innovation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France
Bruno Pereira: Unité de Biostatistique, Délégation Recherche Clinique et Innovation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France
Emmanuel Coudeyre: Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 22, 1-13

Abstract: Balneotherapy may be a relevant treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP) in individuals > 60 years old. This pilot study aimed to determine the effectiveness of balneotherapy for chronic LBP in people > 60 years old and to determine profiles of responders with trajectory model analysis. This was a pilot prospective open cohort study, with repeated measurements using validated questionnaires; participants were their own controls. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a change in pain intensity between the start of treatment and 3 months after treatment assessed with a numeric scale (NS) from 0 to 100 mm, with an effect size (ES) > 0.5. The assessments involved questionnaires that were self-administered on days (D) 1 and 21 and at months 3 and 6. The secondary objective was to determine the profile of responders to balneotherapy. We included 78 patients (69.2% women), mean age 68.3 ± 5.3 years. The mean pain score on the NS was 48.8 ± 19.9 at D1 and 39.1 ± 20.5 at 3 months ( p < 0.001). The ES was 0.47 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25 to 0.69] for the whole sample; 36% (28/78) had an ES > 0.5; 23% (18/78) had a moderate ES (0 to 0.5); and 41% (32/78) had an ES of zero (14/78) or < 0 (18/78), corresponding to increased pain intensity. The pain trajectory model showed that the change in pain between D1 and D21 for trajectory A (larger reduction in pain intensity) was −50% [95% CI −60 to −27], and for trajectory B (smaller reduction in pain intensity), it was −13% [−33 to 0] ( p < 0.001). Between Day 1 and month 3, the change for trajectory A was −33% [−54; 0] and for trajectory B was −13% [−40 to 0] ( p = 0.14). Finally, between D1 and month 6, the change for trajectory A was −50% [−60 to 0] and for trajectory B was −6% [−33 to 17] ( p = 0.007). The patients in trajectory A reported performing more physical activity than those in trajectory B ( p = 0.04). They were also less disabled, with a mean Oswestry Disability Index of 40.4 versus 45.7 for those in trajectory A and B, respectively, ( p = 0.03) and had a higher total Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale score. This real-life study of the effectiveness of balneotherapy on chronic LBP identified distinct pain trajectories and predictive variables for responders. These criteria could be used in decision-making regarding the prescription of balneotherapy, to ensure personalized management of chronic LBP.

Keywords: balneotherapy; chronic low back pain; aged; hydrotherapy; disability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14669/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14669/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14669-:d:966818

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14669-:d:966818