COVID-19 in Pregnancy: Knowledge about the Vaccine and the Effect of the Virus. Reliability and Results of the MAMA-19 Questionnaire

Alice Mannocci (), Claudia Scaglione, Giovanna Casella, Antonio Lanzone and Giuseppe La Torre
Additional contact information
Alice Mannocci: Faculty of Economics, Universitas Mercatorum, Piazza Mattei 10, 00186 Rome, Italy
Claudia Scaglione: Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy
Giovanna Casella: Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy
Antonio Lanzone: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
Giuseppe La Torre: Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 22, 1-15

Abstract: Background: Fear or mistrust of the vaccine and concern for the well-being of their unborn infants are the main reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in pregnant women. The aim of this work was to validate a questionnaire on knowledge about COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and to examine the sources of information in a group of new mothers, as well as their effectiveness and intelligibility. Methods: A literature review was carried out to develop a questionnaire of forty-five questions, divided into six sections, called MAMA-19. The assessment of agreement and the interrater reliability was carried out using Cronbach’s analysis and Cohen’s kappa statistic. Data obtained from the questionnaire were analysed using descriptive and univariate statistics. Results: The total alpha values in the two sections about knowledge of vaccination during pregnancy and about the effects of disease and possible post-COVID-19 consequences for the unvaccinated showed sufficient consistency, at 0.860 and 0.725, respectively. Non-vaccinated women thought that receiving the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy can lead to malformations in the newborn (60% vs. 40%, p = 0.002) and to an increased risk of foetal growth restriction (61.9% vs. 38.1%, p < 0.001). The percentage of vaccinated women was significantly higher than non-vaccinated when more than one professional was consulted and consistent information was received from them (74.2% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.008). Conclusion: The MAMA-19 questionnaire shows results in line with the literature and valid in the two main sections. It is quick to use for measuring communication effectiveness by healthcare professionals and institutions in the context of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in the pregnant population. The results evidence that a physician’s recommendation to get vaccinated is the most important factor in maternal decision making, regardless of geographic, social or educational context.

Keywords: COVID-19; vaccination; pregnancy; questionnaire; validation; vaccine hesitancy; communication; healthcare providers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14886/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14886/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14886-:d:970653

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().