EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Sulfonylurea Use in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and COPD: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Fu-Shun Yen, James Cheng-Chung Wei, Teng-Shun Yu, Chung Y. Hsu, Chih-Cheng Hsu () and Chii-Min Hwu ()
Additional contact information
Fu-Shun Yen: Dr. Yen’s Clinic, No. 15, Shanying Road, Gueishan District, Taoyuan 33354, Taiwan
James Cheng-Chung Wei: Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd., South District, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
Teng-Shun Yu: Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, 3F, No. 373-2, Jianxing Road, Taichung 40459, Taiwan
Chung Y. Hsu: Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
Chih-Cheng Hsu: Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, 35 Keyan Road, Zhunan, Miaoli County 35053, Taiwan
Chii-Min Hwu: Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao Tung University, No. 155, Sec. 2, Linong Street, Taipei 11221, Taiwan

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 22, 1-13

Abstract: We conducted this study to investigate the long-term outcomes of sulfonylurea (SU) use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). We used propensity-score matching to identify 6008 pairs of SU users and nonusers from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2017. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the risks of mortality, cardiovascular events, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, bacterial pneumonia, lung cancer, and hypoglycemia between SU users and nonusers. In the matched cohorts, the mean follow-up time for SU users and nonusers was 6.57 and 5.48 years, respectively. Compared with nonusers, SU users showed significantly lower risks of mortality [aHR 0.53(0.48–0.58)], cardiovascular events [aHR 0.88(0.81–0.96)], non-invasive positive pressure ventilation [aHR 0.74(0.6–0.92)], invasive mechanical ventilation [aHR 0.57(0.5–0.66)], and bacterial pneumonia [aHR 0.78(0.7–0.87)]. A longer cumulative duration of SU use was associated with a lower risk of these outcomes. This nationwide cohort study demonstrated that SU use was associated with significantly lower risks of cardiovascular events, ventilation use, bacterial pneumonia, and mortality in patients with COPD and T2D. SU may be a suitable option for diabetes management in these patients.

Keywords: all-cause mortality; major adverse cardiovascular events; non-invasive positive pressure ventilation; invasive mechanical ventilation; bacterial pneumonia; lung cancer (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15013/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15013/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15013-:d:972873

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15013-:d:972873