Measuring Family Quality of Life: Scoping Review of the Available Scales and Future Directions

Ghaleb H. Alnahdi (), Arwa Alwadei, Flora Woltran () and Susanne Schwab
Additional contact information
Ghaleb H. Alnahdi: Special Education Department, College of Education, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
Arwa Alwadei: Special Education Department, College of Education, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
Flora Woltran: Centre for Teacher Education, Department of Education, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria
Susanne Schwab: Centre for Teacher Education, Department of Education, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 23, 1-26

Abstract: The lack of quality of life is a key issue for families with children with an intellectual disability. While the quality of life for people with disabilities has previously been researched as an individual variable, this has now shifted to include family members. The purpose of this study was to conduct a review of the studies measuring the quality of life of families with an intellectually disabled member, in order to identify the most commonly used scales and their psychometric properties. Method: Data were collected from six databases (ERIC, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, MedLine, and Google Scholar), and this search yielded 3948 studies. One hundred and twenty studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Results: Nine scales were used in the last years to measure the quality of life for families with individuals with an intellectual disability. The Beach Center scale was the most common scale, followed by the Family Quality of Life Survey and the World Health Organization’s quality of life assessment (WHOQoL-BREF). The results showed that the included studies in the review lack the consideration of a broader population representing the different types of cultures with different socioeconomic backgrounds. Key aspects used to assess the FQoL are environmental factors (proximal and distal factors), as well as economic factors. Conclusion: Although the operationalization of the FQoL often incudes several subthemes, a general agreement regarding which domains of the FQoL need to be included in the measurements, and these do not exist right now. Moreover, multidimensional scales are still rare.

Keywords: family quality of life; intellectual disabilities; measurement instruments; scoping review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15473/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15473/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15473-:d:980731

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().