A Critical Evaluation of the Undergraduate Endodontic Teaching in Dental Colleges of Saudi Arabia

Mohammed A. Alobaid (), Saeed Awod Bin Hassan, Ali H. Alfarhan, Salma Ali, Mohammad Shahul Hameed and Sadatullah Syed
Additional contact information
Mohammed A. Alobaid: Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, King Khalid University College of Dentistry, 3263, Abha 61471, Saudi Arabia
Saeed Awod Bin Hassan: Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, King Khalid University College of Dentistry, 3263, Abha 61471, Saudi Arabia
Ali H. Alfarhan: Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, King Khalid University College of Dentistry, 3263, Abha 61471, Saudi Arabia
Salma Ali: Department of Diagnostic Sciences and Oral Biology and Department of Dental Education, King Khalid University College of Dentistry, 3263, Abha 61471, Saudi Arabia
Mohammad Shahul Hameed: Department of Diagnostic Sciences and Oral Biology and Department of Dental Education, King Khalid University College of Dentistry, 3263, Abha 61471, Saudi Arabia
Sadatullah Syed: Department of Diagnostic Sciences and Oral Biology and Department of Dental Education, King Khalid University College of Dentistry, 3263, Abha 61471, Saudi Arabia

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 23, 1-11

Abstract: Background: The purpose of the research was to evaluate the content and delivery of the undergraduate endodontic curriculum. Methods: A needs assessment survey was distributed among the Deans of all the dental colleges in Saudi Arabia. Results: The response rate was 72%. All the colleges include foundational and advanced topics in their curriculum. Didactic lectures, clinical cases, self-directed learning assignments and projects, and videos are the most common teaching methods, whereas virtual learning and reading list are the least popular methods. The average staff-to-student ratio for preclinical and clinical training is 1:6 and 1:7, respectively. Eighty-six percent of colleges utilize dedicated endodontic clinics supervised by specialized endodontists. Eighty percent of colleges use simple cases for canal preparation and obturation. Most colleges do not use magnification and ultrasonic instruments. Saline and sodium hypochlorite are preferred irrigation solutions, whereas calcium hydroxide is the preferred inter-visit medicament. Many use MTA as an advanced material, calcium hydroxide as an inter-visit medicament, and provisional restoration after RCT. Conclusion: The content and delivery of the endodontic undergraduate curriculum are primarily uniform. The use of specialist endodontists dedicated endodontic clinics, rotary instruments, and advanced materials have emerged as curricular strengths. However, diversification of teaching strategies, use of magnification instruments, and an increase in the minimum number of endodontically treated teeth are leading areas demanding curricular improvement.

Keywords: endodontics; curriculum; undergraduate dental; education; pedagogy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15534/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15534/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15534-:d:981512

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().