EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Psychosocial Correlates of Recreational Screen Time among Adolescents

Joanie Roussel-Ouellet (), Dominique Beaulieu, Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im, Stéphane Turcotte, Valérie Labbé and Danielle Bouchard
Additional contact information
Joanie Roussel-Ouellet: Département des Sciences de la Santé, Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR), Campus de Lévis, 1595 Boulevard Alphonse-Desjardins, Lévis, QC G6V 0A6, Canada
Dominique Beaulieu: Département des Sciences de la Santé, Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR), Campus de Lévis, 1595 Boulevard Alphonse-Desjardins, Lévis, QC G6V 0A6, Canada
Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im: Département des Sciences de la Santé, Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR), Campus de Lévis, 1595 Boulevard Alphonse-Desjardins, Lévis, QC G6V 0A6, Canada
Stéphane Turcotte: Centre de Recherche du CISSS de Chaudière-Appalaches, 143 Rue Wolfe, Lévis, QC G6V 3Z1, Canada
Valérie Labbé: CHAU-Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis, 143 Rue Wolfe, Lévis, QC G6V 3Z1, Canada
Danielle Bouchard: CHAU-Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis, 143 Rue Wolfe, Lévis, QC G6V 3Z1, Canada

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 24, 1-15

Abstract: The study objective was to identify the psychosocial correlates of recreational screen time among adolescents. Data collection took place in four high schools from the Chaudière-Appalaches region (Quebec, Canada) from late April to mid-May 2021. A total of 258 French-speaking adolescents (69.8% between 15 and 16 years and 66.3% girls) answered an online questionnaire based on the Reasoned Action Approach. Recreational screen time was measured using the French version of a validated questionnaire. Adolescents reported a mean of 5 h and 52 min/day of recreational screen time. Recreational screen time was associated with being a boy (β = 0.33; p < 0.0001) and intention to limit recreational screen time to a maximum of 2 h/day (β = −0.15; p = 0.0001); this model explained 30% of the variance in behavior. Intention to limit recreational screen time to a maximum of 2 h/day in the next month was associated with attitude (β = 0.49; p < 0.0001), self-identity (β = 0.33; p < 0.0001), being a boy (β = −0.21; p = 0.0109), perceived behavioral control (β = 0.18; p = 0.0016), and injunctive norm (β = 0.17; p < 0.0001); this model explained 70% of the variance in intention. This study identified avenues to design public health interventions aimed at lowering recreational screen time among this population.

Keywords: screen time; concurrent screen use; adolescent; correlates; Reasoned Action Approach (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16719/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16719/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16719-:d:1001765

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16719-:d:1001765