EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing versus Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Treating Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ali Hudays, Robyn Gallagher, Ahmed Hazazi, Amal Arishi and Ghareeb Bahari ()
Additional contact information
Ali Hudays: Community, Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia
Robyn Gallagher: Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2050, Australia
Ahmed Hazazi: Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 13316, Saudi Arabia
Amal Arishi: Medical Surgical Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia
Ghareeb Bahari: Nursing Administration and Education Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 24, 1-17

Abstract: This meta-analysis review compared eye movement desensitization and reprocessing and cognitive behavior therapy efficacy in reducing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression symptoms. A systematic search for articles published between 2010 and 2020 was conducted using five databases. The RevMan software version 5 was used. Out of 671 studies, 8 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Three studies reported that eye movement desensitization and reprocessing reduced depression symptoms better than cognitive behavior therapy in both children, adolescents, and adults (SDM (95% CI) = −2.43 (−3.93–−0.94), p = 0.001). In three other studies, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing were shown to reduce anxiety in children and adolescents better than cognitive behavior therapy (SDM (95% CI) = −3.99 (−5.47–−2.52), p < 0.001). In terms of reducing PTSD symptoms, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing and cognitive behavior therapy did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences (SDM (95% CI) = −0.14 (−0.48–0.21), p = 0.44). There was no statistically significant difference at the three-month follow-up and at the six-month follow-up for depression ( p = 0.31), anxiety ( p = 0.59), and PTSD ( p = 0.55). We recommend randomized trials with larger samples and longer follow-up times in the future.

Keywords: post-traumatic stress disorder; eye movement desensitization and reprocessing; cognitive behavioral therapy; depression; anxiety (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16836/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16836/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16836-:d:1004047

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16836-:d:1004047